2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of penetration per revolution in TBM tunneling as a function of intact rock and rock mass characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metode penilaian massa batuan melibatkan proses analisis kuat tekan batuan intact dan sifat diskontinuitas yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi estimasi perilaku teknik dari suatu massa batuan [4]. Metode penilaian massa batuan telah banyak dikembangkan dan digunakan dalam kegiatan rekayasa teknik, antara lain: prediksi kecepatan penetrasi pemboran pada terowongan [5], analisis perilaku massa batuan setelah penutupan terowongan [6], analisis pengaruh air pada bidang diskontinuitas terhadap stabilitas massa batuan [7], pemodelan aliran airtanah pada batuan terfrakturasi di terowongan [8], dan kestabilan lereng pada potongan massa batuan di jalan raya [4].…”
Section: Terowonganunclassified
“…Metode penilaian massa batuan melibatkan proses analisis kuat tekan batuan intact dan sifat diskontinuitas yang secara signifikan mempengaruhi estimasi perilaku teknik dari suatu massa batuan [4]. Metode penilaian massa batuan telah banyak dikembangkan dan digunakan dalam kegiatan rekayasa teknik, antara lain: prediksi kecepatan penetrasi pemboran pada terowongan [5], analisis perilaku massa batuan setelah penutupan terowongan [6], analisis pengaruh air pada bidang diskontinuitas terhadap stabilitas massa batuan [7], pemodelan aliran airtanah pada batuan terfrakturasi di terowongan [8], dan kestabilan lereng pada potongan massa batuan di jalan raya [4].…”
Section: Terowonganunclassified
“…Mechanical properties of rock and rock mass largely affect the penetration indices; therefore, they are commonly used in TBM performance evaluation (Yagiz 2008;Hassanpour et al 2011;Delisio and Zhao 2014;Benato and Oreste 2015). Similarly, RMR, Q, and other rock mass quality ratings contribute to many TBM performance models (Bieniawski et al 2007;Barton 2000;Hamidi et al 2010;Hassanpour et al 2016;Salimi et al 2017;Maji and Theja 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSM (Rostami, 1997) and NTNU (1998, Bruland, 1998, 2014 models are often used for estimating TBM performance. Other theoretical or empirical formulas and predictive models were proposed or evaluated by Hassanpour et al (2010Hassanpour et al ( , 2011, Delisio and Zhao (2014), Gong and Zhao (2009), Benato and Oreste (2015), Ramezanzadeh (2005), Bieniawski et al (2007), Palmstrom (1995), Barton (2000), Yagiz (2008), Hamidi et al (2010), Jain et al (2014), Salimi et al (2016) and others. Physical and mixed methods consider cutting mechanism, disk cutter forces and wear, and are based on various field and laboratory tests and simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%