2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of mechanical behavior of composites under high strain rate tensile loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the mentioned references and [ 60 , 61 , 62 ], the authors introduced a bilinear hardening model for the layer, here considered a homogenous and isotropic material, as different orientations of yarns on fabric sub-layers tend create properties in a narrower range [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Results Of the Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the mentioned references and [ 60 , 61 , 62 ], the authors introduced a bilinear hardening model for the layer, here considered a homogenous and isotropic material, as different orientations of yarns on fabric sub-layers tend create properties in a narrower range [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Results Of the Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strain rate produced by traditional static and quasi-static loading test equipment is only within 1 s -1 , and the rapid loading function can produce the loading rate within 10 s -1 strain rate range, which cannot simulate the strain rate during explosion and impact. In order to study the dynamic properties of rock in this high strain rate range, the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test system is currently most widely used in experiments, which can apply dynamic loads in the range of 10 2 -10 4 s -1 strain rate to rock specimens [6][7][8][9][10]. Therefore, SHPB was used in this test to conduct impact compression test on specimens.…”
Section: Test Purpose and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Different specimen configurations used for high strain rate tensile testing: a endthreaded cylinder, b 'hat' specimen, c end-threaded specimen with collar, d tensile specimen with bolt grips, e 'M-shaped' specimen. From [48] Fig. 5 Design using epoxy to affix the specimens to the steel fixtures.…”
Section: Tensile Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data often exhibits more scatter in high-rate experiments [46,60], though it is difficult to separate experimental artefacts from random variation in true material response -an issue discussed in more detail later in this review.. Further, the stacking sequence and reinforcement texture may affect the results [69]. Several models have focussed on high strain rate tensile failure [48,70]. The (relatively) one-dimensional failure modes allow the complexities seen elsewhere to be ignored.…”
Section: Tensile Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%