The objective of this paper is to simulate the behavior of unidirectional fabrics, as realistic as possible, in order to be able to use the model in designing impact-resistant packages. There was discussed the influence of the number of layer and the impact velocity on several characteristics as residual velocity of the projectile, its acceleration and the maximum values of von Mises stresses during the impact. Three cases were considered: one layer, two layers and four layers. For all cases, the impact velocity was varied between 100 m/s and 400 m/s, with an increment of 100 m/s, in order to simulate how the panel is damaged. The higher the impact velocity, the stressed area increases when the stress distribution is compared to the stress distribution obtained for v 0 =100 m/s to that for v 0 =300 m/s. At the highest velocity for which the simulation was run, the stressed area has diminished. For the four layer package, for lower velocities, the residual velocity has a lower percentage of the impact velocity, but at high speeds, for this package, the reduction of the residual is even lower (2.7% at v 0 =300 m/s and only 1.75% at v 0 =400 m/s).
This paper presents a study based on simulating the impact between a yarn (or a single fiber with greater dimensions) and a bullet, the impact velocity being 400 m/s. The characteristics of the involved materials are taken from literature. The yarn is considered isotrope, but the values of the characteristics are close to those of aramid fibers and cooper and lead alloys used for manufacturing the bullets. Analysing the yarn failure caused by a bullet, this FE model allows for identfying the stages in the failure process. First, the yarn is pushed by the bullet and the local elongation of the yarn is tacking place. The yarn rupture occurs in the �strangled� zones, caused by the stretch of the yarn directly supporting the impact. The breaking of the yarn in the thinned zone (more pronounced asymmetric breaking) and it is visible that the yarn elastic recoil starts next the bullet. The friction between the yarn and the bullet is only on the conical surface of the bullet in the tapered zone of the bullet. The yarn is detaching from the bullet (the contact zones between the bullet and the yarn in polymeric matrix become smaller, justifying a neglectable influence of the thermal effect). The yarn has no more contact with the bullet. This step is in the favor of the assumption that, in the actual multi-yarn impact, the other layers of yarns maintain the bullet and the first yarns in contact and this is why bunch of fibers (fragments of the failed yarns) are pressed against the bullet and remain on it. The simulation results were qualitatively validated by SEM investigations of fiber failure under the same conditions as the model.
This paper presents results from numerical and experimental investigation on Charpy tests in order to point out failure mechanisms and to evaluate new polymeric blends PP + PA6 + EPDM. Charpy tests were done for initial velocity of the impactor of 0.96 m/s and its mass of 3.219 kg and these data were also introduced in the finite element model. The proposed model takes into account the system of four balls, including support and the ring of fixing the three balls and it has a finer discretization of the impact area to highlight the mechanisms of failure and their development in time. The constitutive models for four materials (polypropylene with 1% Kritilen, two blends PP + PA6 + EPDM and a blend PA6 + EPDM) were derived from tensile tests. Running simulations for each constitutive model of material makes possible to differentiate the destruction mechanisms according to the material introduced in the simulation, including the initiation and the development of the crack(s), based on equivalent plastic strain at break (EPS) for each material. The validation of the model and the simulation results were done qualitatively, analyzing the shape of broken surfaces and comparing them to SEM images and quantitatively by comparing the impact duration, energy absorbed by the sample, the value of maximum force during impact. The duration of the destruction of the specimen is longer than the actual one, explainable by the fact that the material model does not take into account the influence of the material deformation speed in Charpy test, the model being designed with the help of tests done at 0.016 m/s (1000 mm/min) (maximum strain rate for the tensile tests). Experimental results are encouraging for recommending the blends 20% PP + 42% PA6 + 28% EPDM and 60% PA6 + 40% EPDM as materials for impact protection at low velocity (1 m/s). Simulation results are closer to the experimental ones for the more brittle tested materials (with less content of PA6 and EPDM) and more distanced for the more ductile materials (with higher content of PA6 and EPDM).
The issue of impact simulation results from the fact that the impact load is unique and the designed system or element is requested not to fail only once or a small number of loadings. Tests for assessments of the degree of impact protection are expensive and numerous because they require a high probability of impact resistence. In the literature, there are models at the micro level (at fiber level), at the meso level (multi-fiber yarns, several fibers or by evaluating the behavior of the fibers to a monobloc yarn, as is the case with this simulation) and at the macro level (the behavior of element or system is done with some equivalences concerning the material model). This paper presents comparative results of the axis and on the edge of a yarn considered monoblock and isotropic to highlight the differences in the mechanisms of destruction of the yarn and in the evolution of the distribution of equivalent stress, highlighting the differences in the simulation of these two cases explains, at least qualitatively, the differences in the behavior of the panels considered identical.
This paper presents an analysis of data resulting from the same material constitutive model, based on experimental data and model developed by Johnson and Cook. The same case of impacting a cylindrical body on a perfectly rigid target was run with four different mesh size (2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.25 mm). Here, the comparing criterion was the maximum value of von Mises stress and the authors pointed out that the finest mesh here presented is closer to reality. Depending on the case application the engineers could adopt a finer or coarse mesh, but not so coarse to denaturate the reality of body deformation and failure. How to decide? Having performant computer resources (hardware and software) and running several mesh in order to notice the convergence of one parameter or, more reliable, a set of criteria that could include qualitative resemblance with actual bodies as concerning failure and deformation, experimental dat on strain, yield and failure of the involved materials, values of stress and strain, at the same time moments. From this study the following conclusions were formulated: finer mesh presents a earlier failure in time and calculated a higher stress for these moment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.