2018 10th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology (KST) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/kst.2018.8426206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Acidity Levels of Fresh Roasted Coffees Using E-nose and Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of e-noses for beer research is not new in the food science field as they have been used to assess aromas in products such as coffee acidity [22], and roasting level prediction [23], tea quality grading [24][25][26], classification of strawberry juices [24], assessment of wine smoke taint [27] and alcohol content [28], beer quality classification and aging [29][30][31], beer aroma prediction [20], meat quality and shelf life [32,33], olive oil origin and quality [33,34], milk spoilage [35], and rice infestation [36], among others. However, most of the e-noses used in those studies are expensive and need to be installed in a laboratory as they have a similar system to a gas chromatograph (GC), and/or are considered as low-cost compared to a GC, but still, cost ≥ USD 30,000 and require maintenance [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of e-noses for beer research is not new in the food science field as they have been used to assess aromas in products such as coffee acidity [22], and roasting level prediction [23], tea quality grading [24][25][26], classification of strawberry juices [24], assessment of wine smoke taint [27] and alcohol content [28], beer quality classification and aging [29][30][31], beer aroma prediction [20], meat quality and shelf life [32,33], olive oil origin and quality [33,34], milk spoilage [35], and rice infestation [36], among others. However, most of the e-noses used in those studies are expensive and need to be installed in a laboratory as they have a similar system to a gas chromatograph (GC), and/or are considered as low-cost compared to a GC, but still, cost ≥ USD 30,000 and require maintenance [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of unsupervised training, the system learns to detect similarities in unlabeled data structures [ 61 ]. The most popular tools used for pattern recognition include artificial neural networks [ 62 , 63 , 64 ], support vector machines [ 65 , 66 ], principal component analysis [ 67 , 68 ], multiple linear regression [ 69 ], generalized least square regression [ 70 , 71 ], linear discriminant, discriminant function, and stepwise discriminant analysis [ 71 , 72 , 73 ].…”
Section: Technology Used For Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several learning based approaches are used in pattern recognition algorithms of ENs and are essential in improving EN systems [58] . Some frequently used tools include linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [59] , discriminant function analysis (DFA) [60] , stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA) [61] , partial least squares regression (PLSR) [62,63] , generalized least squares regression (GLSR) [64,65] , multiple linear regression (MLR) [66] , principle component analysis (PCA) [60,67] , support vector machines (SVMs) [68,69] and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [70][71][72] . The most frequently utilized data analysis algorithms for different EN sensor types are summarized in Table 2, and algorithm properties including advantages and disadvantages are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Pattern Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%