2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species’ current and future distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
372
3
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(391 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
372
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in MAP in the SW US are less certain than projections of MAT [7], however, evaporative demand is expected to rise with increases in MAT potentially resulting in massive mortality events [4]. While the link between climate and vegetation has been successfully used to model species distributions [26][27][28], part of the difficulty in modeling particular stand-level responses to climate change results from the lack of high-resolution, spatial data on historic climate variables [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in MAP in the SW US are less certain than projections of MAT [7], however, evaporative demand is expected to rise with increases in MAT potentially resulting in massive mortality events [4]. While the link between climate and vegetation has been successfully used to model species distributions [26][27][28], part of the difficulty in modeling particular stand-level responses to climate change results from the lack of high-resolution, spatial data on historic climate variables [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, addition of numerous redundant covariates increases the probability of overfitting. This is of particular concern because many niche-based models use automated fitting methods with minimal or no selection of variables: it is not unusual for models to be built with ca 13 highly correlated covariates [45,46]. This problem is only one form of statistical model misspecification, all forms of which reduce prediction accuracy, while exaggerating precision.…”
Section: Niche-based Distribution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Fill'' refers to the total fit of the matrix. Columns ''NODFcolumns'' and ''NODFrows'' refer to the NODF as measured only according to matrix columns and rows, respectively, while ''NODF'' refers to the total NODF variables, but a minimum set of available parameters have been chosen to avoid overfitting, which in turn may result in artifacts (Beaumont et al 2005;Heikkinen et al 2006;Araújo and Peterson 2012). The fact that the total contribution of the direct abiotic variables (i.e., soil, landscape and climate variables) in the model reaches 10.8 %, whereas bare soil and plant cover attain 14.1 and 0.1 %, respectively, also indicates that patterns resulting from disturbance and biotic interactions may also be important.…”
Section: Probability Of Occurrence and Biotic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%