Predicting Small Target Detection Performance of Low-SNR Airborne Lidar

Abstract

Recent technological advances in the performance of small micro-lasers and multi-channel multi-event photo-detectors have enabled the development of experimental airborne lidar (light detection and ranging) systems based on a low-SNR (LSNR) paradigm. Due to dense point spacing (tens of points per square meter) and sub-decimeter range resolution, LSNR lidar can likely enable detection of meter-scale targets that would go unnoticed by traditional lidar technology. Small vehicle obstructions and other similar targets in the beach and littoral zones are of particular interest, because of LSNR lidar's applicability to the near-shore environment and the general desire to improve detection of antivehicle and antipersonnel obstacles in the coastal zone.A target detection procedure is presented that exploits the detailed information available from LSNR lidar data while diminishing the effect of spurious noise events. Consideration is given to detection in both topographic and bathymetric scenarios. Data sets for target detection analysis are supplied by a numerical sensor simulator developed at the University of Florida. Target detection performance is evaluated as a function of environmental characteristics, such as water clarity and depth, and system parameters, specifically transmitted pulse energy and laser pulse repetition frequency. Analysis of results with regards to consideration for future system design is discussed.

Now You See It… Now You Don’t: Understanding Airborne Mapping LiDAR Collection and Data Product Generation for Archaeological Research in Mesoamerica

“…In electrical engineering jargon this is called Signal-to-Noise-Ratio, or SNR. In terms of ALS, systems can be divided into two main classes: high SNR system and low SNR (as low as single photo-electron events), which are sometimes referred to as "photon counting" systems [30,31]. In high SNR systems the energy of the outgoing laser pulse is relatively high (typically 50 microjoules or more per pulse) and the return signals generally have to be hundreds of photons per shot for the system to record a return.…”

Capability Assessment and Performance Metrics for the Titan Multispectral Mapping Lidar

“…A few returns per square meter has been considered sufficient to derive topographic maps for certain engineering or scientific applications [59]. However, certain applications, such as small target detection or archaeology, benefit from sampling or illuminating 100% or more of the surface of interest [59][60][61]. The combination of three different look angles (nadir, 3.5 • and 7 • forward of the nadir) for the different channels, the varied beam divergence and the larger scan product (product of scan angle and scan frequency) allow for almost full surface illumination in a single pass (Figure 11a).…”

Shallow Bathymetric Mapping via Multistop Single Photoelectron Sensitivity Laser Ranging

“…Inputting more realistic values for the "coastal" water case (a λ,coastal , b λ,coastal ) yields a threshold of 0.76 μJ. Further discussion of the derived equations, noise components, and simulated performance metrics can be found in [7] and [32].…”

“…In the aforementioned static testing, employing maximum gain on the PMT produced very large signals over bare-earth surfaces, resulting in data flow difficulties when attempting to record 100 channels of multistop information. To reduce the data throughput, only channels on the second ranging board (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) or the central 4 × 4 square) were enabled for a majority of the experiments.…”