2014
DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2013-0188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Recidivism of Juvenile Offenders

Abstract: This study uses a large data set to analyze and predict recidivism of juvenile offenders in Pennsylvania. We employ a split-population duration model to determine the effect of covariates on (1) the probability of failure, defined as a second referral to juvenile court, and (2) the time to failure, given that it occurs. A test of the predictive power of our estimates finds a false positive rate of 18.5% and a false negative rate of 20.7%, which compares favorably to the performance of other models in the liter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are mixed. Two studies did not find an association between contextual factors and recidivism (Harris, Mennis et al, 2011; Leverso et al, 2015), while others have found significant and positive relationships with juvenile recidivism (Kalist et al, 2015; Wolff, Baglivio, Intravia, et al, 2017; Wolff et al, 2015, 2016; Yan, 2009).…”
Section: Jurisdictional Differences In Recidivismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results are mixed. Two studies did not find an association between contextual factors and recidivism (Harris, Mennis et al, 2011; Leverso et al, 2015), while others have found significant and positive relationships with juvenile recidivism (Kalist et al, 2015; Wolff, Baglivio, Intravia, et al, 2017; Wolff et al, 2015, 2016; Yan, 2009).…”
Section: Jurisdictional Differences In Recidivismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Brame et al (2003) studied a subsample of adolescent offenders within the 1958 Philadelphia Birth Cohort who had experienced a police contact for an index offense as a juvenile and estimated that nearly 40% of these offenders went on to experience at least 1 police contact in adulthood (by age 27) for another index offense. Kalist and colleagues (2015) studied a large sample of Pennsylvania juveniles (N = 74,684) over the 1997–2005 period and used court referrals as a measure of recidivism. Their analysis reports an overall recidivism rate of 45.6% (49.8% for males and 31.7% for females).…”
Section: Measuring Criminal Desistance and Recidivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, juvenile offenders' features have been identified as preceding criminal behavior in adults (Paternoster et al, 2001). Additionally, recidivism has been linked to the severity of crimes committed (e.g., aggravated theft, homicide, property crime, drug trafficking, among others) (Dembo et al, 1998;Kalist et al, 2015). Approximately 15-25% of prison population meets criteria for a diagnosis of psychopathy or antisocial personality disorder and are four times more likely to reoffend one year post-release (Aharoni et al, 2014;Hart et al, 1988;Saladino et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%