2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting motivational determinants of seatbelt non-use in the front seat: A field study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The TPB has been used extensively to predict intentions and consumption behaviors. Previous TPB-based research has explained speeding intentions [21], travel mode choices [22], drinking and driving behaviors [23], seat belt usage [24], and the adoption of electric vehicles [1]. This study's conceptual framework is premised on the TPB, and is directed at evaluating emerging country business students' intentions and behaviors toward green vehicles.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPB has been used extensively to predict intentions and consumption behaviors. Previous TPB-based research has explained speeding intentions [21], travel mode choices [22], drinking and driving behaviors [23], seat belt usage [24], and the adoption of electric vehicles [1]. This study's conceptual framework is premised on the TPB, and is directed at evaluating emerging country business students' intentions and behaviors toward green vehicles.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among more recent studies, Elliot and Thomson [46] examination of offending drivers' speeding behavior has shown that self-efficacy to be a significant predictor of intention and behavior and the effects of perceived controllability to be insignificant. Okamura et al, [47] investigated the influential factors of seatbelt use and confined the PBC construct to only self-efficacy. Results showed that self-efficacy has a positive significant effect on intention and behavior.…”
Section: Figure 3 Hypothetical Model Explaining the Casual Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of driving behaviour, TPB has been employed to explain speeding (Conner et al ., ; Elliott, Armitage, & Baughan, ; Letirand & Delhomme, ), drinking and driving (Castanier, Deroche, & Woodman, ; Marcil, Bergeron, & Audet, ; Moan & Rise, ), dangerous overtaking, and tailgating (Parker, Manstead, Stradling, Reason, & Baxter, ), the use of mobile phones (Walsh, White, Hyde, & Watson, ; Zhou, Wu, Rau, & Zhang, ) and aggressive behaviour at the wheel (Efrat & Shoham, ; Parker, Lajunen, & Stradling, ). This theory is also invoked to explain the behaviour of pedestrians on the public highway (Evans & Norman, ; Holland, Hill, & Cooke, ; Moyano‐Diaz, ), the wearing of seat belts (Brijs, Daniels, Brijs, & Wets, ; Okamura, Fujita, Kihira, Kosuge, & Mitsui, ; Şimşekoğlu & Lajunen, ) and driving without a licence (Tseng, Chang, & Woo, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have recorded the formation of habits (Åberg, ; Castanier et al ., ; Conner et al ., ; Delhomme, Cristea, & Paran, ; Dinh & Kubota, ; Elliott & Thomson, ; Horvath, Lewis, & Watson, ; Nemme & White, ; Okamura et al ., ; Palat & Delhomme, ; Xu, Li, & Zhang, ; Zhou et al ., ), whether it be explicitly (i.e., by directly citing this concept) or implicitly (i.e., by only including one measurement, without mentioning the concept, and/or without having the aim of demonstrating the importance of habits). The results obtained converge massively in favour of the inclusion of the concept of habit as a direct predictor of behaviours (i.e., distinct from behavioural intention).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%