1994
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.50.r1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precision lifetime measurements of the 6p2P1/2,3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several experimental [17,26,27,28] and theoretical [29,30,31,32] works have been devoted to the determination of the dipole matrix elements. In particular, the measurement of the excited states |6P 1/2 and |6P 3/2 lifetimes provides a direct method to know the reduced matrix elements through the well-known expression of the spontaneous emission: Table 4.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experimental [17,26,27,28] and theoretical [29,30,31,32] works have been devoted to the determination of the dipole matrix elements. In particular, the measurement of the excited states |6P 1/2 and |6P 3/2 lifetimes provides a direct method to know the reduced matrix elements through the well-known expression of the spontaneous emission: Table 4.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second, more precise, calculation we dropped all the simplifying assumptions mentioned above [8], still keeping diagonal matrix elements only, and numerically evaluated Eqs. (13,14) by using recent experimental values [13] of the reduced dipole matrix elements 6S 1/2 d 6P j . As a result, the discrepancy with experiments becomes even larger [point (f") in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained values for the free Cs atom and for Cs in a spherical He bubble are listed in Table 1, together with the transition wavelengths and the lifetimes. For the free Cs atom we obtain a lifetime which is approximately 4% larger than the precise experimental value of [16,17]. This sets a scale for the precision of our model calculations.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 74%