2006
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2006-10383-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciliation of experimental and theoretical electric tensor polarizabilities of the cesium ground state

Abstract: Abstract. -We present a new theoretical analysis of the strongly suppressed F -and Mdependent Stark shifts of the Cs ground state hyperfine structure. Our treatment uses third order perturbation theory including off-diagonal hyperfine interactions not considered in earlier treatments. A numerical evaluation of the perturbation sum using bound states up to n=200 yields ground state tensor polarizabilities α2(6S 1/2 , F ) which are in good agreement with experimental values, thereby bridging the 40-year-old gap … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polarizability α is traditionally broken down via series expansion in both the perturbation order n at which the component contributes and the multipole order k of its interaction, which, following the notation and methods established in Refs. [13][14][15][16], we will denote as α (n) k . The sublevel energies of the Cs 6S 1/2 ground state of interest here are affected only by the polarizabilities α (2) 0 , α (3) 0 , and α (3) 2 , where the (by far dominating) scalar secondorder polarizability α (2) 0 is independent of F and m F , and therefore does not contribute to a differential energy shift of the states coupled by the clock transition.…”
Section: A the Stark Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The polarizability α is traditionally broken down via series expansion in both the perturbation order n at which the component contributes and the multipole order k of its interaction, which, following the notation and methods established in Refs. [13][14][15][16], we will denote as α (n) k . The sublevel energies of the Cs 6S 1/2 ground state of interest here are affected only by the polarizabilities α (2) 0 , α (3) 0 , and α (3) 2 , where the (by far dominating) scalar secondorder polarizability α (2) 0 is independent of F and m F , and therefore does not contribute to a differential energy shift of the states coupled by the clock transition.…”
Section: A the Stark Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (1a) and (1b) represent the result originally derived by Sandars [17], after correction of a sign error that was uncovered in Refs. [15,16]. Note also that we set h = 1 in the definition of polarizabilities, so that the latter are expressed in the practical "laboratory units" of Hz/(kV/cm) 2 .…”
Section: A the Stark Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alkali atom in its electronic ground state, when placed in a static electric field, experiences a shift, hδ, of its energy levels due to the Stark effect [11,12],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of static polarizabilities provides an important benchmark for calculations resulting in significant improvement of optical clock performance [5,6]. No less important are polarizability measurements for the ground state hyperfine components of the alkali atoms used in microwave atomic clocks (see, e.g., [7]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%