Pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions: the legal status of consent

Abstract

Purpose: The focus of this paper is on consent issues surrounding pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions. First, we explore the potential consequences of the different types of pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions that might be used, and we examine the current Canadian practice with respect to these interventions. We then analyze the status of consent to pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions under the current legal framework. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to improve the current legal framework. Principal findings:In Canada, as in many countries in the world today, there is a shortage of organs available for transplantation. Canada's deceased donor rate was 12.8 per million in 2005, a rate that has been stable over the past 12 years. At the end of 2005, the number of Canadians on waiting lists for an organ was 4,025 (125 out of every million Canadians). In total, 283 patients died in 2005 while waiting for new organs. To address the shortage of available organs, a number of changes have recently been made to organ donation practices and protocols. The use of pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions is a significant issue in organ donation, and it has become increasingly important to reflect on the use of such interventions, in light of these new practices. "Pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions" are interventions that are carried out on a patient, before his or her death, for the purpose of optimizing the chances of successful transplantation. Conclusions:We argue that consent is legally required and must be express and competent patients have the legal authority to consent; but the law with respect to legal authority to consent on behalf of incompetent patients varies across the country. We come to the unsettling conclusion that the legality of pre-mortem transplantation optimizing interventions in many circumstances is at best questionable. We provide concrete recommendations (draft statutory text) on how to improve the current legal framework.

Islam and End-of-Life Practices in Organ Donation for Transplantation: New Questions and Serious Sociocultural Consequences

“…When life support systems are administered for organ preservation without consent, the interests are not those of the patient but rather those of a third party (i.e., procurement professionals and potential organ recipients) (Verheijde, Rady & McGregor, 2007b). For that reason, it has been argued that first-person consent is necessary to perform organ preservation procedures and interventions before death (Downie, Rajotte & Shea, 2008). In multicultural societies, reliance on presumed (i.e., no) consent to the use of life support systems for organ preservation creates an unrealistic "one size fits all" approach toward end-of-life care.…”

Legislation and Policy Recommendations on Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation From an International Consensus Forum

“…One option is to ensure that substitute consent for donation mirrors the law governing substitute consent for medical treatment so that the same person is authorized to make decisions in both contexts. 38 Another possibility is to enable individuals to appoint their own donation decision-maker in advance, empowering that person to make decisions about both premortem interventions and donation. 37…”

Against the family veto in organ procurement: Why the wishes of the dead should prevail when the living and the deceased disagree on organ donation

“…Here, the family is informed of the deceased's decision to donate, and they are offered counselling and support should they disagree. 49 Despite initial fears that this would lead to lawsuits, such fears never transpired. 50 A broad and recent study further adds to the confidence we could have in policies giving priority to the wishes of the deceased.…”