1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199005000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Issues of Experimental ROC Analysis Selection of Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Receiver operating characteristic analysis has become a favored method for reflecting diagnostic accuracy [30]- [33], although there are acknowledged problems of spectrum bias in control patients [34], and problems of establishing the true (or gold standard) diagnosis [35]. In an ROC experiment each evaluated image or movie is assigned a rating, and by convention a higher rating indicates greater evidence of the presence of an abnormality.…”
Section: B Diagnostic-accuracy Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiver operating characteristic analysis has become a favored method for reflecting diagnostic accuracy [30]- [33], although there are acknowledged problems of spectrum bias in control patients [34], and problems of establishing the true (or gold standard) diagnosis [35]. In an ROC experiment each evaluated image or movie is assigned a rating, and by convention a higher rating indicates greater evidence of the presence of an abnormality.…”
Section: B Diagnostic-accuracy Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we used three different probability density functions (PDF) to draw random samples: Gaussian (a common assumption in medical diagnostic performance evaluation 1,2 ), Beta (appropriate for modeling highly polarized scores like the detection of pneumothoraxes 3 ), and Uniform (providing a piecewise constant ROC curve). All distribution parameters were adjusted so that an AUC of 0.8 was achieved (see Fig.…”
Section: Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve a proper and smooth receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the scoring should be evenly distributed, 1,2 which is generally hard to achieve. Furthermore, the observers may have difficulties using the rating scale consistently throughout an experiment, 3 and the observers should be familiar with the image genre to avoid inconsistent scoring within the lengthy study. 1 In this paper, we aim to reduce the complexity and duration of human reader studies using multiple rounds of a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm while regenerating a full confidence-scoring scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…instead of giving binary answer (i.e. present or absent) (Obuchowski 2003 ; Metz 1978 ; Hanley & McNeil 1982 ; Berbaum et al 1989 ; Metz 1989 ; Gur et al 1989 ). The fundamental problem of rating is that the decision needs to be “not obvious”, and “should be of borderline difficulty” (Metz 1978 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%