Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1453805.1453807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical issues in subjective video quality evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some literature that suggests a person’s attitude toward a visual stimulus may affect: (a) their perception of its image quality, and (b) their perception of the stimulus itself (Kortum & Sullivan, 2010; Pozueco et al, 2017; Sullivan, Pratt, & Kortum, 2008). For this reason, we asked participants to subjectively rate their experience of each video clip by asking them three questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some literature that suggests a person’s attitude toward a visual stimulus may affect: (a) their perception of its image quality, and (b) their perception of the stimulus itself (Kortum & Sullivan, 2010; Pozueco et al, 2017; Sullivan, Pratt, & Kortum, 2008). For this reason, we asked participants to subjectively rate their experience of each video clip by asking them three questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When facing the audience outside the laboratory, the slight difference in video quality parameters of different quality films may lose significance due to the influence of environment or hardware. Only the perception of very obvious difference in SVQA is valuable ( Sullivan et al., 2008 ). Considering the importance of SVQA as a part of QoE, this study used the method of controlling OVQA parameters of video samples to investigate and evaluate SVQA of audience.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed solution [21,28] is to more accurately measure the system quality and acceptability by immersing the subject in a more natural viewing experience. This "immersive method" uses distractor questions and longer audiovisual sequences to focus the subject on the intended application.…”
Section: Practicalmentioning
confidence: 99%