2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11001-018-9367-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical approaches to maximizing the resolution of sparker seismic reflection data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-processing, in this case, included predictive deconvolution to attenuate the secondary pulse of the sparker signature at ca. 1 ms (e.g., Kluesner et al 2018). In this dataset, due to the lack of frequencies lower than 0.2 kHz, in most channels the fundamental ghost null frequency was below the noise level, and the auto-picker started at the second order harmonic; however, the broader bandwidth allowed us to introduce up to four higher order harmonics in the optimisation.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pre-processing, in this case, included predictive deconvolution to attenuate the secondary pulse of the sparker signature at ca. 1 ms (e.g., Kluesner et al 2018). In this dataset, due to the lack of frequencies lower than 0.2 kHz, in most channels the fundamental ghost null frequency was below the noise level, and the auto-picker started at the second order harmonic; however, the broader bandwidth allowed us to introduce up to four higher order harmonics in the optimisation.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…shown in Fig. 1, wavefronts propagating upwards from the source can similarly be reflected off the sea-surface, thereby generating source-side ghost reflections (e.g., Kluesner et al 2018). In particular, this paper focusses on the attenuation of the receiver-side ghosts when the receivers depth is unknown, non-homogeneous across the streamer and nonconstant during acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group spacing was either 1.5625 or 3.125 m, and the source was a 1.2‐kJ SIG minisparker, providing peak frequencies between 100 and 500 Hz (3‐ to 5‐m vertical resolution) and up to 1.5 s of subbottom penetration. Processing of each of the high‐resolution MCS data sets followed an approach outlined by Kluesner et al (2018) and included the following steps: (1) corrections to geometry calculations, (2) detailed trace editing, (3) Butterworth band‐pass filtering, (4) dip filtering, (5) velocity analysis, (6) common depth point (CDP) trim statics corrections, (7) CDP stacking, (8) migration, (9) poststack predictive deconvolution, and (10) automatic gain control. The processed data were loaded into IHS Kingdom Suite and OpendTect for horizon mapping, interpretation, and integration with core logs from ODP Site 893.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misalignment of traces in common‐midpoint (CMP) gathers will cause destructive interference and loss of higher frequencies in the final stack, making accurate normal moveout (NMO) and static corrections particularly important for VHR multichannel marine seismic data (Kluesner et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another static correction approach was recently applied by Jones () and Kluesner et al . (). Using high‐resolution sparker data, traces within each NMO‐corrected CMP gather were cross‐correlated with a pilot trace (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%