Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1023720.1023734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
338
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(342 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
338
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, when the target passes through the 1 t point as shown in Fig. 1, all nodes do not need to join in the task for tracking a mobile target.…”
Section: Proposed Tracking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, when the target passes through the 1 t point as shown in Fig. 1, all nodes do not need to join in the task for tracking a mobile target.…”
Section: Proposed Tracking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, all nodes do not need to join in the task for tracking a mobile target. Instead, it is more energy efficient for only the nodes 1 S around the mobile object to join in collecting information of the target and performing collaborative work among them. Other nodes located far from the target do not need to waste their powers to monitor the target.…”
Section: Proposed Tracking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, existing platforms (e.g., nesC/TinyOS [4]) for programming sensor networks use event-driven programming model and, hence, require the designer be responsible for stack management, buffer management, and flow control [5,6]. Therefore, to rapidly prototype and quickly evaluate protocols, the designers of existing power management protocols (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]) implement their own simulators or model their protocols in specialized simulators (e.g., GloMoSim [14]). However, it is desirable that the designers prototype their protocols in nesC/TinyOS platform as it provides a framework for generating both simulation as well as production code from the same source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%