2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccicct.2014.6993044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and delay comparison of 1 Bit full adder designs at 180nm and 90nm technology

Abstract: This paper puts forward a comparison between two 1 bit full adder designs: one using 4T XOR and the other using 4:1 MUX based 3 Input XOR. Both are designs are made up of 10 transistors. The simulation is done using Cadence S imulator at 180nm and 90nm Technology. Comparison is made among the two proposed designs with respect to power and delay. The results show the efficiency of the design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Prasad et al [13] and Wariya et al [14] compared XOR-XNOR-based FA circuits. A comparative study of FAs conducted in by Singh et al [15] and Harish et al [16] explored FAs that are implemented using various logics. However, the investigation was only conducted for four FAs in [15] and five FAs in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Prasad et al [13] and Wariya et al [14] compared XOR-XNOR-based FA circuits. A comparative study of FAs conducted in by Singh et al [15] and Harish et al [16] explored FAs that are implemented using various logics. However, the investigation was only conducted for four FAs in [15] and five FAs in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative study of FAs conducted in by Singh et al [15] and Harish et al [16] explored FAs that are implemented using various logics. However, the investigation was only conducted for four FAs in [15] and five FAs in [16]. FA comparison in [17] compared 7 cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%