Potential solutions for discrimination in STEM

Diele‐Viegas, Luisa Maria; Cordeiro, Tábata Elise Ferreira; Emmerich, Tatiana; Hipólito, Juliana; Queiroz-Souza, Caren; Sousa, Erilda Barbosa de; Vançan, Alianna Cardoso; Leite, Luciana

doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01104-w

Cited by 18 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…women with impostor's syndrome) but not a judicious one since, for example, women productivity is the same as men (Leta 2014;Huang et al 2020) which we also found for publication and impact of those publications in Brazilian Entomology, reported in the follow-up study. These issues are not exclusively feminine, as we generally lack diversity in academia in a broader sense, with other minority groups being even less represented in an environment led by a white male cis hetero model (Turney et al 2020;Diele-Viegas et al 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because leading institutions are dominated by white cis men, it would be relevant to bring and inspire change by carving new paths with -and not for -minorities (Feir et al 1990;Abramson et al 2013), possibly understanding a breakthrough idea that science can be done without superiority. Solutions to achieve equity might not be easy to be implemented due to, for example, political, administrative, and cultural barriers, yet they can include (but are not limited to) new evaluation metrics, inclusive policies, supportive working environments, and promotion of the inclusion and permanence of underrepresented groups (Diele-Viegas et al 2021). Changing evaluation metrics is a widely discussed topic (e.g., Reece and Hardy 2017), and evidences for positive benefits for doing so are numerous.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This mismatch is even higher due to the increase of people worldwide reaching higher education (Bradley 2000), followed by lower numbers of academic job positions in the past years (Taylor 2011;Yamada 2019). This scenario favors a spillover effect marked by the replication of internal biases of a poorly diversified hierarchical chain strongly marked by a male, white, and cisgender perspective (Diele-Viegas et al 2021).…”

Section: Edited By Juliano Morimotomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The limited recognition is aggravated with intersectionality, that is, women who also belong to other minority groups (mothers, LGBTQ + , Indigenous, Black, Asian, people with disabilities, among others) that lack credibility, opportunities, and live with bullying or racism/sexism/ableism/etc. by their peers (Feir et al 1990;Abramson et al 2013;Khan et al 2019;Hipólito et al 2020;Staniscuaski et al 2020;Turney et al 2020;Diele-Viegas et al 2021). Female researchers during COVID-19 pandemic, for example, published less than male academics, and among them, Black women and mothers were the most negatively impacted (Staniscuaski et al 2021).…”

Section: Edited By Juliano Morimotomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although women are about half of world’s population, they are underrepresented in many sectors including academia and the research scenario in general. Gender gap in Entomology has been pointed out in other publications; however, data for Brazil has never been demonstrated. Here we provide a diagnosis for the Brazilian Entomology scenario in order to contribute to propositions towards disentangling the gender gap in general. We analyzed scientometric data for Brazilian Entomology focusing on gender disparity and on personal perceptions related to the gender gap through an online questionnaire. We detected a pervasive gender bias in which the scissor-shaped curve is the most representative effect of it: women were the majority in lower degree stages but the minority in higher degree stages (permanent positions and positions of prestige and power). We also observed mentorship bias and discussed these results in light of intersectionality and the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender differences were perceived differently by the questionnaire respondents considering age, gender, and parenting. With this data and analyses, we have provided elements to stimulate and support change to a healthier and more equitable academic space.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Edited By Juliano Morimotomentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Edited By Juliano Morimotomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Está demostrado que la calidad y la capacidad innovadora de la ciencia aumentan cuando ésta es más inclusiva (Hofstra, 2020). Para lograr una ciencia inclusiva, tenemos que continuar trabajando contra todas las formas -interrelacionadas -de discriminación a colectivos tradicionalmente poco representados en las carreras STEM (Ciencia, Tecnología, Ingeniería y Matemáticas, del inglés Science, Technology, Egeneering and Mathematics) entre las cuales la discriminación machista es una de las principales problemáticas (Diele-Viegas et al, 2021). Las principales manifestaciones de la discriminación machista en la ciencia son la falta de referentes, el sesgo inconsciente (por el cual las mujeres somos percibidas como menos competentes, mientras que a los hombres se les valora mejor en publicaciones científicas, consiguiendo más fondos y contratos de investigación), el abuso sexual y los problemas derivados de la maternidad y el reparto desigual del trabajo doméstico o trabajo de cuidados.…”

Section: Introducción Y Objetivosunclassified

Género y educación: escuela, educación no formal, familia y medios de comunicación.

Andaluz¹,

Galãn²

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

No está permitida la reproducción total o parcial de este libro, ni su incorporación a un sistema informático, ni su transmisión en cualquier forma o por cualquier medio, sea este electrónico, mecánico, por fotocopia, por grabación u otros métodos, sin el permiso previo y por escrito del editor. La infracción de los derechos mencionados puede ser constitutiva de delito contra la propiedad intelectual (art. 270 y siguientes del Código Penal).Diríjase a Cedro (Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos) si necesita fotocopiar o escanear algún fragmento de esta obra. Puede contactar con Cedro a través de la web www.conlicencia.com o por teléfono en el 917021970/932720407

show abstract

Discriminatory episodes negatively impact the quality of life of Brazilian dental students: A cross‐sectional study

Sartori

Karam

Chisini

et al. 2023

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate whether discriminatory episodes occurring in the university environment were associated with dental students' self‐perceived overall quality of life and assess the cumulative effect of perceived discriminatory experiences on the overall quality of life.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional study, all students enrolled in three Brazilian dental schools were invited to participate in a survey between August and October 2019. The outcome was students’ self‐perceived quality of life, measured through the overall quality of life item of the World Health Organization—Quality of Life Abbreviated Version (WHOQOL‐BREF). Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyses (95% confidence intervals and α of 5%) were conducted using RStudio software.ResultsThe sample was composed of 732 students (70.2% response rate). The great part was female (66.9%), white or yellow skin color (67.9%), and were children of highly educated mothers. About 68% of the students reported having experienced at least one of the seven discriminatory experiences presented in the questionnaire and 18.1% reported neutral or negative quality of life. In multivariable analyses, it was estimated that students who experienced at least one episode of discrimination were 2.54 times (95% CI: 1.47–4.34) more likely to report worse quality of life than their counterparts who reported no experience of discrimination. There was also a 25% (95% CI: 1.10–1.42) increase in the odds of reporting poorer quality of life for each additional discriminatory experience reported.ConclusionReporting at least one discriminatory situation in the academic environment was associated with worse quality of life among dental students, and a cumulative effect was also noted.

show abstract

Potential solutions for discrimination in STEM

Cited by 18 publications

References 8 publications

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario

Género y educación: escuela, educación no formal, familia y medios de comunicación.

Discriminatory episodes negatively impact the quality of life of Brazilian dental students: A cross‐sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About