2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.3694111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of dual‐energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship

Abstract: The ΔHU-ρ(e) calibration line with a simple one-to-one correspondence would facilitate the construction of a well-calibrated ρ(e) image from acquired dual-kV images, and currently, second generation DSCT may be a feasible modality for the clinical use of the ΔHU-ρ(e) conversion method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
160
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
160
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the method proposed by Saito [37] to establish a relation between ∆HU and ED theoretically demonstrated an agreement within 0.7% and 2.5% for simulated and measured ED respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the method proposed by Saito [37] to establish a relation between ∆HU and ED theoretically demonstrated an agreement within 0.7% and 2.5% for simulated and measured ED respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the basis of the stoichiometric calibration of Schneider et al (1996), the parametrization of Jackson and Hawkes [19] relies on Mayneord's power law [26,44] and is limited when it comes to modelling the photoelectric effect in human tissues containing high-Z materials, such as bone [51] or the thyroid [52]. Other problems also arise with the attempt to consistently defining the EAN using a power law, as the choice of the exponent is arbitrary [3,23,37]. One advantage in using an extended cross section parametrization [47,22,27] is to improve the accuracy to which one can model high-Z components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) was found to be 3.3 for the diagnostic photon-energy range. 8 This choice of m value is recommended in a previous DECT work by Yang et al 2 On the other hand, the Z m eff and lnI values of the materials are often estimated from their known elemental compositions in an analogous manner of additivity rule as…”
Section: A Derivation Of Spr From Dect Data Via Q E and Z Eff Calimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Here, HU k is the CT number in Hounsfield units for high-kV (k = H) and low-kV (k = L) scans, which is related to the so-called "reduced CT number", u k = HU k / 1000 + 1. a is the weighting factor for subtraction and c L is the proportionality constant for the low-energy u L data. These two can be regarded as material-independent but scanner-and protocol-specific fit parameters.…”
Section: A Derivation Of Spr From Dect Data Via Q E and Z Eff Calimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though PDDs are relatively insensitive to a change in energy spectrum, agreement in the reference and material‐based PDDs provide the clinician confidence that the dose calculation algorithm will accurately compute dose in the material. Methodologies for estimating electron density from CT number have been previously explored 13, 14. Notably, Michiels et al2 reported on the use of dual‐energy CT to estimate the effective atomic number of a 3D‐printed material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%