2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of alternate forest management practices to sequester and store Carbon in two forest estates in British Columbia, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EAM CC 40 3 10 2 2 1 3 13 1 I 759 226 354 77 55 67 10 20 77 L 939 204 680 165 35 55 17 44 137 OG 999 315 998 25 20 44 25 48 176 NHM L 1197 255 955 113 46 73 15 16 146 UAM L 978 118 893 179 44 28 13 40 89 OG 987 208 886 93 34 43 4 21 295 U 605 151 579 48 61 34 77 40 77 UG 478 158 538 64 26 6 38 60 68 Tab. Man et al (2013) also reported that reduced harvest levels stored significantly more carbon over the 100-year planning horizon as compared to strategies that focused on tree growth rates (Johnson et al 2009). Similar conclusions have also been drawn from boreal forests (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Man et al 2013, Europe (Fortin et al 2012), and Chile (Swanson 2009), Australia (Ranatunga et al 2008), and other regions.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Agb Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EAM CC 40 3 10 2 2 1 3 13 1 I 759 226 354 77 55 67 10 20 77 L 939 204 680 165 35 55 17 44 137 OG 999 315 998 25 20 44 25 48 176 NHM L 1197 255 955 113 46 73 15 16 146 UAM L 978 118 893 179 44 28 13 40 89 OG 987 208 886 93 34 43 4 21 295 U 605 151 579 48 61 34 77 40 77 UG 478 158 538 64 26 6 38 60 68 Tab. Man et al (2013) also reported that reduced harvest levels stored significantly more carbon over the 100-year planning horizon as compared to strategies that focused on tree growth rates (Johnson et al 2009). Similar conclusions have also been drawn from boreal forests (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Man et al 2013, Europe (Fortin et al 2012), and Chile (Swanson 2009), Australia (Ranatunga et al 2008), and other regions.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Agb Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular challenge, in this regard, is to seek site-specific management options because of the variations among ecosystem types and between the regions and their importance at different temporal scales (e.g., short-term vs. longterm values - Lafortezza et al 2008). Stimulated by these needs, numerous large-scale experiments in the United States (Chen et al 2014) and elsewhere (Garcia-Gonzalo et al 2007, Ranatunga et al 2008, Fortin et al 2012, Man et al 2013) were initiated to manipulate ecosystem structures and compositions. These experiments, unlike conventional approaches in forestry and ecology (Sheriff & He 1997), were designed to mimic natural and human disturbances at large spatial scales and to quantify the ecological responses with sound controls of the manipulations and statistical confidence (i.e., random block design with at least three replications).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alex Fraser Research Forest (AFRF) (average site index of 22.1 (range 15-26)) located in the Central Interior forest region of British Columbia and the Malcolm Knapp Research Forest (MKRF) (average site index of 25.6 (range 20-40)) located in the Coastal forest region of British Columbia are described in detail in Man et al (2013). The third forest estate (FE3) is 14,920 ha in size and is located in the boreal plains, approximately 40 km South East of Dawson Creek, British Columbia.…”
Section: Forest Estatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harvest reduction strategies have a higher potential for producing Carbon credits in the short term (25 to 50 years). Man et al (2013) found little difference in the number of Carbon credits produced between different harvest reduction strategies, and suggested that reducing the harvest level to a fixed target below the baseline provides the forest manager with more flexibility. Strategies to increase forest growth rates above the baseline levels include fertilization and planting genetically improved stock; however, these strategies store significantly less Carbon than the harvest reduction strategies (Man et al, 2013) and pose the risk of not being able to deliver the projected growth increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation