2015
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1349-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in aboveground biomass following alternative harvesting in oak-hickory forests in the eastern USA

Abstract: , ranging from 1.60 to 1.94 Mg ha -1 yr -1 at the NHM plots. Changes in the net AGB growth rate were contributed by different growth rates of live trees and mortality and exhibited clear intra-annual variation during the five sampling periods. We observed a decreasing contribution of Quercus velutina (black oak) AGB (~6%), an increasing trend for Q. alba (white oak), and a stable change for Q. coccinea (scarlet oak) during the study period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to many previous studies (e.g., [13,58,59]), our results indicate that only a few species contributed to most of the tree biomass within the study area. Although the plot had 51 species, only five species accounted for 78.4% of the biomass and only 10 species accounted for 91.1% of the biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to many previous studies (e.g., [13,58,59]), our results indicate that only a few species contributed to most of the tree biomass within the study area. Although the plot had 51 species, only five species accounted for 78.4% of the biomass and only 10 species accounted for 91.1% of the biomass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While passive or low-intensity management options have been found to yield the greatest carbon storage benefit, assuming no inclusion of substitution effects (Nunery and Keeton 2010) or elevated disturbance risks (Hurteau et al 2016), we suggest the consideration of SCE to enhance carbon storage. Multiple studies have explored co-benefits provided by management for or retention of elements of stand structural complexity, including residual large living and dead trees, horizontal variability, and downed CWM (Angers et al 2005, Schwartz et al 2005, Dyer et al 2010, Gronewold et al 2012, Chen et al 2015. Silvicultural treatments can effectively integrate both carbon and late-successional biodiversity objectives through SCE based on this study and previous research (e.g., Dove and Keeton 2015).…”
Section: Implications For Adaptive Forest Carbon Management Integratimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…, Chen et al. ). Silvicultural treatments can effectively integrate both carbon and late‐successional biodiversity objectives through SCE based on this study and previous research (e.g., Dove and Keeton ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value comes from biomass data based on forest inventories at the Harvard Forest site in the northeastern US (Munger & Wofsy, 2020), which was assumed as a typical value for temperate deciduous forests in the US. Although there is not an overall biomass estimate for the Missouri Ozarks site, studies of other Missouri forests have found biomass ranging from 5 to 20 kg/m 2 (Chen et al., 2015; Hanberry et al., 2016; Q. Li et al., 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%