2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for greenhouse gas reduction and energy recovery from MSW through different waste management technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The financial model analyzed the current situation of MSW sector in Saudi Arabia showed that AD and gasification WTE plants are financially profitable endeavors in terms of investment indicators, i.e., net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), modified internal rate of return (MIRR), profitability index (PI), and Levelized Cost of Waste (LCOW) [63]. Recent studies reported new technologies such as membrane, solvent absorption, adsorption, and low-temperature techniques such as cryogenic could be successfully applied for capturing methane gas [64,65].…”
Section: Mitigation Measures To Reduce Methane Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The financial model analyzed the current situation of MSW sector in Saudi Arabia showed that AD and gasification WTE plants are financially profitable endeavors in terms of investment indicators, i.e., net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), modified internal rate of return (MIRR), profitability index (PI), and Levelized Cost of Waste (LCOW) [63]. Recent studies reported new technologies such as membrane, solvent absorption, adsorption, and low-temperature techniques such as cryogenic could be successfully applied for capturing methane gas [64,65].…”
Section: Mitigation Measures To Reduce Methane Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSW generation and treatment in landfills commonly including rapidly biodegradable waste that increased significantly GHG emissions releasing into the atmosphere [36], whilst LFG is mainly composed of CH4 and CO2 gases [37][38][39] contributing about 45-60% and 40-60% respectively [40]. Both CH4 and CO2 gases are the main GHGs because of their capacity to trap solar energy [41].…”
Section: Assessment Of Ghgs Emission Reduction Potential From Msw Landfillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 2 GHGi,CO eq Emission  is the emission of GHG i converted to the unit of CO2-eq; GHGi Emission is the emission of GHG i estimated in the unit of ton or kg, and index,i GWP is the Global Warming Potential of GHG i that can be referenced from Table 1 below. To calculate the total value of GHG emission reduction potential generated from landfills for each year based on the computing scenario plan having biogas recovery to produce power generation can be shown in (6) [36,44].…”
Section: Assessment Of Ghgs Emission Reduction Potential From Msw Landfillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, livestock population intensification is linked to an increase in waste production, reaching 26.5 million tons and 33.7 million m 3 for solid and liquid wastes, respectively (Nguyen Van Bo, 2017). Waste disposal is not yet organized, with an estimation of about 60% of wastes treated and used effectively through technologies as such biogas digesters and composting (Ginting et al, 2003;(Nguyen Van Bo, 2017;Yaman et al, 2020). The rest remains untreated and is directly released into the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is potential to switch from waste to energy and contribute to economic, social, and environmental benefits (Aracil et al, 2018;Yılmaz & Abdulvahitoğlu, 2019;Yaman et al, 2019;Yaman et al, 2020). Biogas digesters have been known for their multi-purpose nature, treating waste and producing energy at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%