2004 Users Group Conference (DOD_UGC'04) 2004
DOI: 10.1109/dod_ugc.2004.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential discrepancies in radar signature predictions for ground vehicles

Abstract: method. This represents a typical time for far-field calculations and the actual time required varies with azimuth and depression angle (due to different multi-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we present simulation results of a complicated target, a model of tank, to illustrate the SAR images in free space and above a rough surface and the changes of amplitudes and locations of scattering points when the target is above different rough surfaces. ere are also tank results that could be obtained in [4,5]. e size of tank model is 29 in length, 1 7 in width, and 73 in height.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next we present simulation results of a complicated target, a model of tank, to illustrate the SAR images in free space and above a rough surface and the changes of amplitudes and locations of scattering points when the target is above different rough surfaces. ere are also tank results that could be obtained in [4,5]. e size of tank model is 29 in length, 1 7 in width, and 73 in height.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guan et al computed the scattered �elds of a perfectly electrical conducting (PEC) target above a �nite PEC rough surface using the method of moment (MoM) and half-space Green's function [2]. Xpatch could be used to calculate the scattering by objects-either PEC or dielectric-above a dielectric rough surface using the high-frequency (HF) methods and generate the SAR images rapidly [3][4][5]. However, the parameters of the ground or sea surface, including the dielectric constant, and electric conductivity could not be enumerated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%