2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1991-7902(10)60010-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential biomarkers for the cytologic diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral cancer is the 11th most common malignancy in the world (Ghantous and Abu Elnaaj, 2017) and is the most common head and neck malignant tumors that has a high mortality rate. The most common type of oral cancer is Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), which includes for approximately 90% of oral malignancies (Franzmann since fifty years ago and this is maybe due to the fact that OSCC patients are diagnosed at late stages, and there is no reliable and definitive diagnostic marker for early diagnosis of this disease (Yang et al, 2010). Currently, OSCC is diagnosed usually in stages III and IV, with less effective treatment and a therapeutic success of 30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Oral cancer is the 11th most common malignancy in the world (Ghantous and Abu Elnaaj, 2017) and is the most common head and neck malignant tumors that has a high mortality rate. The most common type of oral cancer is Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), which includes for approximately 90% of oral malignancies (Franzmann since fifty years ago and this is maybe due to the fact that OSCC patients are diagnosed at late stages, and there is no reliable and definitive diagnostic marker for early diagnosis of this disease (Yang et al, 2010). Currently, OSCC is diagnosed usually in stages III and IV, with less effective treatment and a therapeutic success of 30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly OSCC is less detected in the early stages; early diagnosis by screening will be an obvious solution (Franzmann et al, 2005). Therefore, the use of sensitive and specific biomarkers for molecular detection along with histological sampling would be a convenient, accessible, non-invasive and inexpensive method for OSCC diagnosis (Yang et al, 2010. It seems that ELISA-based techniques as a screening tool for society are the most cost-effective methods; because its implementation is simpler and cheaper than DNA-based techniques (Franzmann et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 However, prognosis in OSCC depends on the histopathological grading and clinical staging of the tumour. 1,2,4,7 Rate of dysplasia may also show the following abnormal cell characteristics which include increase in mitotic figures, binucleation and multinucleation, changes in shape and size of nuclear, hyperchromatic, and keratinization. 7 Mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia to severe dysplasia categories may show abnormalities epithelium with many different grades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%