“…In recent years, several of them have been reported to have less sensitivity and notable energetic performance due to their stable extensive grids. − However, it is crucial to screen an energetic ligand with good performance as it can endow high detonation performance of energetic MOFs. Due to the large nitrogen percentage, heterocyclic azole-based energetic ligands, such as pyrazole, imidazole, triazole, and tetrazole, were preferred due to their high bond energies: C–N (273 kJ/mol), N–N (160 kJ/mol), NN (418 kJ/mol), and NN (954 kJ/mol). , Among all, tetrazole is highly preferred due to its high energy content. − Besides, EMOFs employing alkali metal ions as nodes are more economical and eco-friendly than transition metal/heavy metal ions. ,, Sodium and potassium ions stick out due to their high coordination ability and endow high density, thermal stability, and mechanical hardness to EMOFs. ,, However, the known tetrazole-based Na/K energetic MOFs are limited and have gained significant attention, mainly due to their high performance and environmental compatibility. ,,, Na-based energetic MOFs, such as [Na(H 2 BTT) (H 2 O) 2 ] n (a), [Na(atza)] n (b), and [Na 2 (tza)] n (c), represented a substantial improvement in thermal stability and insensitivity with low detonation performances (Figure ), while KNAT and K 2 DNABT were sensitive and less thermally stable. ,, …”