2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postpartum Psychosocial and Behavioral Health: A Systematic Review of Self-Administered Scales Validated for Postpartum Women in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPDS was initially made for postpartum depression but has been frequently used to evaluate prenatal depressive symptoms as well [22,23]. Internal consistency in our sample was high, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.86 at mid-pregnancy, 0.87 at 6 months, and 0.86 at 12 months postpartum, similar to other studies [24,25].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The EPDS was initially made for postpartum depression but has been frequently used to evaluate prenatal depressive symptoms as well [22,23]. Internal consistency in our sample was high, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.86 at mid-pregnancy, 0.87 at 6 months, and 0.86 at 12 months postpartum, similar to other studies [24,25].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, the tools use depressive symptoms to stratify probable depression or risk of depression but do not represent a diagnosis of clinical depression. Overall, both the CES-D and EPDS are regarded as adequate screening tools for postpartum depression in obstetric literature, but we cannot assume that all of the positive depression screens in these studies resulted in clinical depression diagnoses [29]. That being said, as mentioned in the introduction, there are data suggesting that even depressive symptoms that do not meet clinical depression criteria have negative health effects on both the mother and baby, suggesting clinical significance in all positive perinatal depression screens [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…based on prior work. 12 14 Discrepancies between the two independent coders’ coding were minimal. After all five articles were coded, key information from each article was summarized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following strategies used in earlier literature review studies, 12 14 we performed three rounds of systematic selection in the PubMed database: (a) keyword search in Titles/Abstracts and MeSH terms, (b) screening of titles and abstracts, and (c) screening of full-text articles. The searches were performed on 5 February 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%