2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2021.106347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-landing major element quantification using SuperCam laser induced breakdown spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSEs of TiO 2 have higher standard deviations (1.3 wt.% for PLS models and 1.8 wt.% for LASSO models) than other elements, which may be caused by its lower concentration (Figure 4), and thus low intensities of Ti emission lines. In addition, the RMSEs of the PLS and LASSO models are comparable to the published models for MarSCoDe [7], ChemCam [13], and SuperCam [15], while all PLS models have lower RMSEs than the LASSO models (Figure 6). For example, the RMSEs of SiO 2 are 8.3 wt.% for the PLS model (this work), 9.4 wt.% for the LASSO model (this work), 6.9 wt.% for the MarSCoDe test model, 5.3 wt.% for the ChemCam model, and 6.1 wt.% for the SuperCam model.…”
Section: Multivariate Models For Major Elementssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The RMSEs of TiO 2 have higher standard deviations (1.3 wt.% for PLS models and 1.8 wt.% for LASSO models) than other elements, which may be caused by its lower concentration (Figure 4), and thus low intensities of Ti emission lines. In addition, the RMSEs of the PLS and LASSO models are comparable to the published models for MarSCoDe [7], ChemCam [13], and SuperCam [15], while all PLS models have lower RMSEs than the LASSO models (Figure 6). For example, the RMSEs of SiO 2 are 8.3 wt.% for the PLS model (this work), 9.4 wt.% for the LASSO model (this work), 6.9 wt.% for the MarSCoDe test model, 5.3 wt.% for the ChemCam model, and 6.1 wt.% for the SuperCam model.…”
Section: Multivariate Models For Major Elementssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…PLS and LASSO are commonly used multivariate regression methods to interpret spectroscopic spectra of geological samples [15,[23][24][25][26]. We built 100 multivariate models Al, O, H, and C) were identified based on the NIST database [22].…”
Section: Multivariate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Viscosity Error analysis. In order to provide some measure of the error of these viscosity derivations, we use the error estimate from Anderson et al (2022). The average Root Mean Squared Error of Prediction (RMSEP) from their Table 5 is 1.85 wt %.…”
Section: Viscosity Results and Lava Lake Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SuperCam VISIR is an optical spectrometer that covers the 0.4-0.85 and 1.3-2.6 µm wavelength ranges, providing reflectance spectra boresighted with LIBS and RMI instruments (Fouchet et al, 2022). SuperCam VISIR measurements are reported in two accompanying papers in this special collection (Royer, 2022;Mandon, 2022).…”
Section: Supercam Visir Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%