2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 are based on similar conceptual models to those used by the applicant, but the modelling software, parameter values and detailed modelling assumptions differ somewhat. In general, however, results from direct attempts to reproduce the applicant's consequence assessment calculations are in agreement with those presented in SR-Site, with calculated doses at a similar level and general trends being in good agreement (Walke et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Results From Consequence Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…1 are based on similar conceptual models to those used by the applicant, but the modelling software, parameter values and detailed modelling assumptions differ somewhat. In general, however, results from direct attempts to reproduce the applicant's consequence assessment calculations are in agreement with those presented in SR-Site, with calculated doses at a similar level and general trends being in good agreement (Walke et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Results From Consequence Analysissupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas system understanding relating to the highest exposure can arguably be derived from a much simpler model as discussed by Walke et al (2015), we are confident that the present biosphere model has a level of detail that is fit for purpose, namely to robustly demonstrate protection of humans and the environment over very long time periods in a heterogeneous landscape going through considerable change.…”
Section: Dose To Humansmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If resource limitations mean that assumptions have to be made, and this is very likely in the context of environmental assessments (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1994;Rowe and Frewer, 2000;Kloprogge et al, 2011;Krueger et al, 2012;Duncan, 2013;Walke et al, 2015), these assumptions need to be assessed and tested (Lipshitz and Strauss, 1997;Tarantola et al, 2002;Canter and Atkinson, 2010). The entire set of assumptions (or hypotheses) to be analyzed concerning the possible outcomes or impacts needs to be consistent with the available knowledge and data on the options.…”
Section: Identifying Options and Impacts For A Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tullos, 2009), or when the assumptions made are not easily verifiable (e.g. Attanayake and Waterman, 2006;Walke et al, 2015). Uncertainty is also present when: (i) there is no agreement as to the criteria to use to evaluate the importance of the impacts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%