2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive and negative transcriptional regulation of aromatase expression in human breast cancer tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we show that MLT actions on BAFs are not promoter-specific and suppress each of the three promoters expressed. This data correlates with what is observed in MCF-7 cells despite the subtle differences in modes of PII transcriptional activation by alternative transcription factors in the two different cell types [14,20]. Elevated levels of PI.4 in CAFs are due to elevated levels of class I cytokines and glucocorticoids within the tumor c Aromatase activity following PGE 2 (1 lM) stimulation alone or in combination with MLT (1 nM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, we show that MLT actions on BAFs are not promoter-specific and suppress each of the three promoters expressed. This data correlates with what is observed in MCF-7 cells despite the subtle differences in modes of PII transcriptional activation by alternative transcription factors in the two different cell types [14,20]. Elevated levels of PI.4 in CAFs are due to elevated levels of class I cytokines and glucocorticoids within the tumor c Aromatase activity following PGE 2 (1 lM) stimulation alone or in combination with MLT (1 nM).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In cancer cells and surrounding stroma, cAMP levels increase and aromatase promoters are switched to the cAMPdependent promoters I.3 and II (Chen et al 1999). While the same group has also observed an upregulation in aromatase expression in breast cancer cells themselves through non-genomic action of ERa in conjunction with growth factor-mediated pathways in vitro, our finding of unchanged aromatase protein levels in both normal and malignant breast epithelium somewhat question the clinical relevance of their results (Chen et al 2005). We have also been unable to detect a positive correlation between aromatase and ER status, which is in line with the observations by several other groups (Sasano et al 1994, Pasqualini & Chetrite 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Moreover, BRCA1 directly bound to the aromatase I.3/II promoter region, and hormonal stimulation of aromatase promoter activity decreased both BRCA1 levels and promoter binding. In malignant breast tumors, aromatase is expressed in both fibroblasts and malignant epithelial cells (29,30). Our data indicate that BRCA1 regulates aromatase expression in MCF7 and SKBR3 breast cancer cell lines, suggesting that BRCA1 deficiency in malignant breast tumors may lead to further aromatase overexpression in breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%