Aromatase is the enzyme that converts androgen to estrogen. It is expressed at higher levels in breast cancer tissues than normal breast tissues. Grape seed extract (GSE) contains high levels of procyanidin dimers that have been shown in our laboratory to be potent inhibitors of aromatase. In this study, GSE was found to inhibit aromatase activity in a dosedependent manner and reduce androgen-dependent tumor growth in an aromatase-transfected MCF-7 (MCF-7aro) breast cancer xenograft model, agreeing with our previous findings. We have also examined the effect of GSE on aromatase expression. Reverse transcription-PCR experiments showed that treatment with 60 Mg/mL of GSE suppressed the levels of exon I.3-, exon PII-, and exon I.6-containing aromatase mRNAs in MCF-7 and SK-BR-3 cells. The levels of exon I.1-containing mRNA, however, did not change with GSE treatment. Transient transfection experiments with luciferasearomatase promoter I.3/II or I.4 reporter vectors showed the suppression of the promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. The GSE treatment also led to the down-regulation of two transcription factors, cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein-1 (CREB-1) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR). CREB-1 and GR are known to up-regulate aromatase gene expression through promoters I.3/II and I.4, respectively. We believe that these results are exciting in that they show GSE to be potentially useful in the prevention/treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer through the inhibition of aromatase activity as well as its expression. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(11): 5960-7)
In situ estrogen synthesis is implicated in tumor cell proliferation through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms especially in postmenopausal women. Several recent studies demonstrated activity of aromatase, an enzyme that plays a critical role in estrogen synthesis in breast tumors. Proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein-1 (PELP1/MNAR) is an estrogen receptor (ER) coregulator, and its expression is deregulated in breast tumors. In this study, we examined whether PELP1 promotes tumor growth by promoting local estrogen synthesis using breast cancer cells (MCF7) that stably overexpress PELP1. Immunohistochemistry revealed increased aromatase expression in MCF7-PELP1-induced xenograft tumors. Real-time PCR analysis showed enhanced activation of the aromatase promoter in MCF7-PELP1 clones compared with MCF7 cells. Using a tritiated-water release assay, we demonstrated that MCF7-PELP1 clones exhibit increased aromatase activity compared with control MCF-7 cells. PELP1 deregulation uniquely up-regulated aromatase expression via activation of aromatase promoter I.3/II, and growth factor signaling enhanced PELP1 activation of aromatase. PELP1-mediated induction of aromatase requires functional Src and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathways. Mechanistic studies revealed that PELP1 interactions with ER-related receptor-alpha and proline-rich nuclear receptor coregulatory protein 2 lead to activation of aromatase. Immunohistochemistry analysis of breast tumor array showed increased expression of aromatase in ductal carcinoma in situ and node-positive tumors compared with no or weak expression in normal breast tissue. Fifty-four percent (n = 79) of PELP1-overexpressing tumors also overexpressed aromatase compared with 36% (n = 47) in PELP1 low-expressing tumors. Our results suggest that PELP1 regulation of aromatase represents a novel mechanism for in situ estrogen synthesis leading to tumor proliferation by autocrine loop and open a new avenue for ablating local aromatase activity in breast tumors.
Aromatase converts androgens to estrogens. Although thirdgeneration aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are important drugs in hormonal therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women, there are concerns about the side effects associated with the estrogen deprivation achieved with AIs. Expression of aromatase in breast cancer tissue is driven by different promoters than those in noncancer tissues; thus, suppression of aromatase expression in cancer tissues through the down-regulation of breast tumorspecific promoters would reduce the side effects associated with whole-body suppression of estrogen biosynthesis by AIs. We report that histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 (panobinostat) is a potent inhibitor of aromatase expression (with an IC 50 value < 25 nM). LBH589 selectively suppresses human aromatase gene promoters I.3/II, which are preferentially used in breast cancer tissue. Furthermore, using the H295R cell culture model, we found that achieving the same degree of inhibition of aromatase activity required only one-fifth as much letrozole (an AI) in the presence of 25 nM LBH589 as in the absence of LBH589. We also used an H295R/MCF7 coculture model to demonstrate the synergistic interaction of LBH589 + letrozole in suppressing the proliferation of hormone-responsive breast cancer cells. Finally, our results also indicate that LBH589 down-regulates the activity of promoters I.3/ II in an epigenetic fashion. LBH589 reduces the levels of C/EBPδ, decreases the binding of C/EBPδ, and increases the levels and binding of acetyl-histones to the promoters I.3/II. These findings provide an important basis for future clinical evaluations of LBH589 in hormone-dependent breast cancer.
Antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors are important drugs in the treatment of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. To investigate the effects of these drugs on gene expression in breast cancer cells, we treated estrogen receptor -positive MCF-7 cells stably transfected with the aromatase gene (known as MCF-7aro cells) with testosterone, 17B-estradiol, two aromatase inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole), and an antiestrogen (tamoxifen). We found that testosterone or 17B-estradiol induced the proliferation of MCF-7aro cells at a rate six times faster than the untreated cells. In addition, the testosterone-induced proliferation of MCF-7aro cells was effectively suppressed by letrozole, anastrozole, or tamoxifen. Microarray analyses on Affymetrix Human Genome U133A GeneChips (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) were carried out using total RNA isolated from the control and treated cells. At the false discovery rate of 0.05 and a minimum fold-change criteria of 1.5, 104 genes were identified that were up-regulated and 109 genes were identified that were down-regulated by both androgen and estrogen. More than 50% of these hormone-regulated genes were counterregulated by all three inhibitors and >90% were counterregulated by at least one of the inhibitors. Comparing the effect of each inhibitor on gene expression, we observed that letrozole and anastrozole are more similar in terms of the genes they affect compared with treatment with tamoxifen. To validate the gene expression profiles identified from microarray analyses, the expression patterns of 13 representative genes were examined by Northern analysis. Finally, the genes identified as statistically significant were classified based on their expression patterns and biological function/pathways. The results of this study provide us with a better understanding of the actions of both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens at the molecular level. We believe that the results of this study serve as the first step in identifying unique expression patterns following drug treatment, and that this will ultimately be useful in customizing patient treatment strategies for hormone-dependent breast cancer.
Aromatase is the enzyme responsible for the last step of estrogen synthesis. The female hormone, estrogen, is known to stimulate breast cancer cell growth. Because the expression of aromatase in breast cancer tissues is driven by unique promoters I.3 and II, a more complete understanding of the regulatory mechanism of aromatase expression through promoters I.3/II in breast tumors should be valuable in developing targeted therapies, which selectively suppress estrogen production in breast tumor tissue. Results from in vivo footprinting analyses revealed several protein binding sites, numbered 1 to 5. When site 2 (À124/À112 bp, exon I.3 start site as +1) was mutated, promoters I.3/II activity was dramatically reduced, suggesting that site 2 is a positive regulatory element. Yeast one-hybrid screening revealed that a potential protein binding to site 2 was CCAAT/enhancer binding protein D (C/EBPD). C/EBPD was shown to bind to site 2 of aromatase promoters I.3/II in vitro and in vivo. C/EBPD up-regulated promoters I.3/II activity through this site and, as a result, it also up-regulated aromatase transcription and enzymatic activity. p65, a subunit of nuclear factor-KB (NF-KB) transcription factor, inhibited C/EBPDup-regulated aromatase promoters I.3/II and enzymatic activity. This inhibitory effect of p65 was mediated, in part, through prevention of the C/EBPD binding to site 2. This C/EBPD binding site in aromatase promoters I.3/II seems to act as a positive regulatory element in non-p65-overexpressing breast cancer epithelial cells, whereas it is possibly inactive in p65 overexpressing cancer epithelial cells, such as estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells. [Cancer Res 2008; 68(11):4455-64]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.