2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore fabric geometry inferred from magnetic and acoustic anisotropies in rocks with various mineralogy, permeability and porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the grains in sandstones are typically orientated such that their pore major axis is sub-parallel to bedding (Louis et al 2003;Benson et al 2005;Robion et al 2014;Griffiths et al 2017;Farrell and Healy 2017), a higher permeability parallel to bedding is perhaps expected. Although we do not provide an average orientation for the pore or grain major axes of the Buntsandstein sandstones studied herein, we do note that their average grain aspect ratios are within the range 1.54-1.76 (Table 1).…”
Section: Matrix Permeability Of the Buntsandsteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the grains in sandstones are typically orientated such that their pore major axis is sub-parallel to bedding (Louis et al 2003;Benson et al 2005;Robion et al 2014;Griffiths et al 2017;Farrell and Healy 2017), a higher permeability parallel to bedding is perhaps expected. Although we do not provide an average orientation for the pore or grain major axes of the Buntsandstein sandstones studied herein, we do note that their average grain aspect ratios are within the range 1.54-1.76 (Table 1).…”
Section: Matrix Permeability Of the Buntsandsteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional pore characterization methods such as X-ray tomography face trade-offs between sample size and resolution, and generate large amounts of data that need to be processed (Cnudde andBoone, 2013, Landis andKeane, 2010). For applications that require characterization of the average pore fabric, MPFs provide a promising alternative in that they describe the average pore fabric as a single second-order tensor, measured on a representative sample volume, and potentially capturing pores down to 10 nm, without being affected by mineral and grain boundary properties unlike seismic anisotropy (Robion et al, 2014, Almqvist et al, 2011, Pfleiderer and Halls, 1990, Benson et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, MPFs were compared to other measures of pore space anisotropy, e.g. anisotropy of elastic properties or electrical conductivity (Louis et al, 2005, Robion et al, 2014, Benson et al, 2003, Nabawy et al, 2009. Although reported empirical relationships for fabric orientation are similar for all studies (maximum susceptibility indicating the average pore elongation direction and maximum permeability), there is a large variability in reported relationships between MPF anisotropy degree and pore aspect ratio or degree of permeability anisotropy (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) of ferrofluid‐impregnated samples has been proposed as a fast and efficient method to assess the average 3‐D structure of connected pores (Parés et al, ; Pfleiderer & Halls, , ). MPF measurements can capture pores down to 10 nm (Parés et al, ; Robion et al, ), and because AMS characterizes the full second‐order tensor, no a priori knowledge on the fabric orientation is necessary. The few studies that exist on MPF found promising empirical relationships between the average pore orientation and the AMS of ferrofluid‐impregnated samples (Jones et al, ; Pfleiderer & Halls, , ), or between permeability anisotropy and MPF (Benson et al, ; Hailwood et al, ; Louis et al, ; Pfleiderer & Halls, ; Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%