Populism and Critical Incidents in Journalism: Has Bolsonaro Disrupted the Mainstream Press in Brazil?

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of studies examining the conflicts between the media and populist leaders, understanding how such clashes prompt shifts in journalism norms and practices remains to be thoroughly explored. Based on a literature review and the discussion of an extensive array of examples characterizing the Brazilian media setting, this article provides a qualitative assessment of how Jair Bolsonaro's rhetoric and actions have triggered a “critical incident” in our mainstream journalism. We consider four dimensions currently experiencing transformations: the media's (1) institutional responses and campaigns, (2) production of the news, (3) production of editorials, and (4) how media professionals have reacted to populist attacks. There is evidence that journalism has increasingly become a central topic in news texts. We have also cataloged changes in news production routines (e.g., the editors’ hesitancy to send reporters to cover some political events), the use of editorials to reinforce metajournalistic discourses, and shifts in how professionals make sense of their work. Our findings contribute to the broader literature by investigating how traditional borders and values of journalism are renegotiated during institutional crises. In addition, our analytical framework can be applied to other media settings experiencing similar tensions and help underpin the construction of empirical variables to understand meaningful changes in the field. Lastly, this study considers the possible effects that change in norms, routines, and practices can have on the democratic roles of journalism.

Who is who in fact-checked conspiracy theories? Disseminators, sources, and the struggle for authority in polarized environments

“…According to Kaltwasser (2021), even after coming to power, populist leaders need to keep the impression that they keep fighting the establishment-and this is where conspiracy theories can be helpful. Furthermore, trust in populist leaders is often associated with belief in conspiracies (Stecula and Pickup, 2021), which reinforces the relevance of studying polarized political environments (Marques, 2023;Fontes and Marques, 2022).…”

“…The heightened use of social media to spread political messages marked the Brazilian elections in 2018 (Mitchelstein et al, 2020; Marques, 2023). During the second electoral round between Fernando Haddad and Jair Bolsonaro, Haddad’s alleged proposal to create a “gay kit” for six-year-olds was among the most shared fake news.…”

“…The Comprova is particularly relevant in a polarized society where politicians have sponsored conspiracy theories to question journalism’s credibility (Marques, 2023). Bringing together rival companies may be motivated by an interest in exploring niche markets (Çomlekci, 2022) or reinforcing the field’s authority.…”

The Evidence of Populism in the Narratives of the President of Brazil during the Covid-19 Pandemic

“…Bolsonaro used the media to rally the public against democratic institutions like the legislature and the judiciary (Costa & Bernardi, 2020, p. 89). Consequently, the politician affected the relationship between the administration and the media from a perspective in which it began to question the veracity and engagement of information from the communication vehicles (Marques, 2023).…”

Panem et circenses: removing political news to generate electoral support, evidence from Berlusconi's Italy

“…However, more indirect forms of political influence can arise in the presence of networks of connections between political actors and media ownership, which facilitate the alignment of editorial narratives with referents' political objectives (Dragomir, 2018;Gerli et al, 2018). Such external influences tend to erode public service information, diminishing its watchdog role (Marques, 2023). However, media also operate as autonomous entities driven by distinctive incentives and motivations.…”