1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80193-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyostotic heterogeneity of the spine in osteoporosis. Quantitative analysis and three-dimensional morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous studies of age-related changes in vertebral and iliac crest bone microstructure have been performed using 2D histomorphometric methods [9][10][11][12][13]. However, some of these 2D measures such as trabecular thickness are based on model assumptions leading to biased determinations of the bone microstructure [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies of age-related changes in vertebral and iliac crest bone microstructure have been performed using 2D histomorphometric methods [9][10][11][12][13]. However, some of these 2D measures such as trabecular thickness are based on model assumptions leading to biased determinations of the bone microstructure [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational and histological studies have shown that the cancellous structure of vertebral bodies is comprised mainly of vertical plates with interconnecting horizontal rods [6]. It has also been shown histologically that there is considerable heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of cancellous bone within vertebral bodies [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diabetic sand rat (Psammomus obesus) has been shown to develop a greater degree of OP in weight-bearing bones than in the spine (Amir et al, 1991) and there is growing evidence that bone volume in human osteoporotic subjects varies in axial and appendicular bones (Amling et al, 1994;Riggs et al, 1981). To address this question, we compared the degree of OP in the axial and appendicular skeleton to determine which bones are more suitable for the study of OP in the Cohen diabetic rat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%