The object of this study was to analyze the cortical thickness (Ct.Th) of the ventral and dorsal shell of the vertebral bodies throughout the human spine in aging and in osteoporosis. Therefore, the complete front column of the spine of 26 autopsy cases (aged 17-90, mean 42 years) without diseases affecting the skeleton and of 11 cases (aged 58 -92, mean 77 years) with proven osteoporosis were removed. A sagittal segment prepared through the center of all vertebral bodies was undecalcified, embedded in plastic, ground to a 1 mm thick block, and stained using a modification of the von Kossa method. The analysis included the measurement of the mean cortical thickness of both the ventral and dorsal shell, respectively (from the third cervical to the fifth lumbar vertebral body). The qualitative investigation of the structure of the cortical ring completed the analysis. The presented data revealed a biphasic curve for both the ventral and dorsal shell, skeletally intact with high values of the cortical thickness in the cervical spine (285 m), and a decrease in the thoracic (244 m) and an increase in the lumbar spine (290 m). The mean thickness of the ventral shell is in general greater than the thickness of the dorsal shell in both skeletally normal and osteoporotic cases. The cortical thickness of the spine showed no gender-specific differences ( p ؍ NS). There was a slight decrease of the cortical thickness with aging; however, this decrease and the correlation of cortical thickness to age was only significant below vertebral body T8 (r ؍ 0.225-0.574; p r < 0.05-0.005). Most interestingly, however, osteoporosis presents itself with a highly significant loss of cortical thickness throughout the whole spine. This decrease of cortical thickness was more marked in the dorsal shell (
The objective of this study was to elucidate the structure of cancellous bone and its age-related changes at different skeletal sites. Therefore, the lumbar spine, iliac crest, femur, and calcaneus of 12 age- and sex-matched skeletal healthy autopsy cases (6 females, 6 males, aged 28-84 years, mean 54 years) were removed. The following analysis includes an evaluation of the trabecular bone volume (BV/TV, %) and the trabecular interconnection (TBPf, mm-1) as well as a qualitative investigation of the structure of trabecular bone. BV/TV shows the following mean values: lumbar spine, 8.3% (+/- 0.8%); iliac crest, 11.5% (+/- 1.6%); intertrochanteric, 10.2% (+/- 1.2%); femoral neck, 15.8% (+/- 1.6%); and calcaneus, 15.4% (+/- 2.0%). There are significant differences between the BV/TV of the femoral neck and that of the lumbar spine as well as between that of the calcaneus and the lumbar spine (p < 0.01). However, a positive correlation can be seen between the bone mass of the spine and that of all other investigated sites (r = 0.67 to r = 0.80; pr < 0.1). The trabecular interconnection of the lumbar spine (2.7 mm-1, SEM +/- 0.2 mm-1) and the femoral neck (0.3 mm-1, SEM +/- 0.3 mm-1) differs significantly. Only these two sites show a significant positive correlation of TBPf (r = 0.60; pr < 0.1). Age-dependent alteration of the spine and the femoral neck in bone mass and bone structure is nearly the same. The trabecular microarchitecture of the iliac crest varies systematically. A region 4-10 cm behind and 1-3 cm below the anterior superior iliac spine turns out to be the most suitable biopsy site because of its closest relation to the lumbar bone mass. However, drawing information about the trabecular interconnection within the lumbar spine by measurement of the iliac crest at any site seems to be impossible. The horizontal specimens reveal a vertical running tubular spongiosa pattern that is arranged in concentric rings starting from the dorsal shell like a honeycomb. The comparison of TBPf in horizontal and vertical planes and its age-related changes indicates the age-related bone loss to be predominantly a loss of horizontal trabeculae. Thus, the presented data provide further information about the skeletal distribution and heterogeneity of the trabecular microarchitecture.
Fractures of the odontoid process are potentially serious injuries; Type II and III fractures, as described by Anderson and D'Alonzo, are seen in the emergency room especially in young adolescents and individuals over 60 years of age. The etiology of these fractures is still controversial. Malunion and nonunion in both types of fractures are presumed to be due to insufficient external or internal fixation, but this theory has not been fully explained. To examine these issues, the authors expanded their prior studies of the anatomy of the axis. For histomorphometric analysis of cancellous and cortical bone, the axis was removed in 37 autopsies (26 normal and 11 osteoporotic cases) and sectioned in the sagittal plane to a thickness of 1 mm using a surface-stained block-grinding technique. The base of the dens is the region of least resistance for fractures because of its reduced trabecular bone volume, a poorer trabecular interconnection, and a cortical thickness one-third that of the axis. In all cases, trabeculae were disconnected from the trabecular lattice, and in 30%, microcallus formations were demonstrated in the base of the dens. A special filigree type of trabeculae in the base of the dens is often seen in patients with osteoporosis; microarchitectural differences of cancellous bone between the base of the dens and the other regions of the axis are also markedly increased. The authors infer from the data that the bone structure of the axis is responsible for the location, distribution, and frequency of fractures of the odontoid process in normal healthy bone and this frequency is greatly increased in individuals with osteoporosis. The deficiency of bone mass within the base also suggests a new explanation for the occurrence of nonunions, even after treatment of fractures of the base of the dens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.