1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism, distribution, and segregation of AFLP markers in a doubled haploid rice population

Abstract: We exploited the newly developed amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique to study the polymorphism, distribution and inheritance of AFLP markers with a doubled haploid rice population derived from 'IR64'/'Azucena'. Using only 20 pairs of primer combinations, we detected 945 AFLP bands of which 208 were polymorphic. All 208 AFLP markers were mapped and distributed over all 12 chromosomes. When these were compared with RFLP markers already mapped in the population, we found the AFLP markers to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
70
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
12
70
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The key difference is that in ALFP, the fragments are then size-separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as a means of identifying size variants while GBS uses next-gen sequencing to identify SNP variants (Vos et al 1995). Two different groups working with an IR64xAzucena double haploid population (developed using the same IR64xAzucena parents as in this RIL population) noted that chromosomes were "stretched" with the integration of AFLP markers into RFLP genetic maps (Maheswaran et al 1997;Virk et al 1998). In 1996 specifically noted a correlation between genetic map size and the number of AFLP markers and hypothesized that these expansions had to be the result of map function error, possibly as a result of segregation distortion (Maheswaran et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key difference is that in ALFP, the fragments are then size-separated using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as a means of identifying size variants while GBS uses next-gen sequencing to identify SNP variants (Vos et al 1995). Two different groups working with an IR64xAzucena double haploid population (developed using the same IR64xAzucena parents as in this RIL population) noted that chromosomes were "stretched" with the integration of AFLP markers into RFLP genetic maps (Maheswaran et al 1997;Virk et al 1998). In 1996 specifically noted a correlation between genetic map size and the number of AFLP markers and hypothesized that these expansions had to be the result of map function error, possibly as a result of segregation distortion (Maheswaran et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different groups working with an IR64xAzucena double haploid population (developed using the same IR64xAzucena parents as in this RIL population) noted that chromosomes were "stretched" with the integration of AFLP markers into RFLP genetic maps (Maheswaran et al 1997;Virk et al 1998). In 1996 specifically noted a correlation between genetic map size and the number of AFLP markers and hypothesized that these expansions had to be the result of map function error, possibly as a result of segregation distortion (Maheswaran et al 1997). Virk et al, followed up on this hypothesis in 1997 by trying to reduce the size of their genetic map by controlling for segregation distortion, without success (Virk et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Vos et al, 1995) depends on the reliability of restriction fragment length polymorphism and the high efficiency of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify digested genome DNA segments selectively. AFLP is highly reliable for the assessment of genetic variation among and within populations (Maheswaran et al, 1997). AFLP has been widely applied to study genotyping, population differentiation, and genetic diversity in a wide variety of organisms, such as catfish (Mickett et al, 2003), tilapia (Agrestia et al, 2000), and penaeid shrimp (Wang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, 70 AFLP markers specific to the donor G. sturtianum were detected, while the RAPD study revealed only 49 G. sturtianum-specific markers . AFLP is therefore a powerful technique for DNA fingerprinting in cotton, as demonstrated in other crops (Maheswaran et al 1997;VanToai et al 1997;Paran et al 1998). Although the similarity of some BC progenies at the DNA level with cultivated cotton increased with backcrossing and selfing, some other progenies expressed a similarity lower than that observed between their mother parent and the upland cotton G. hirsutum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%