2019
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1541099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate irrigation as an adjunctive to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG) phosphate irrigation in periodontal treatment. Materials and Methods: The subjects comprised 59 patients with severe chronic periodontitis. Plaque index, bleeding on probing (BOP) and pocket probing depths (PPD) were recorded. The subjects were randomly allocated to one of three groups for scaling and root planning, with different adjunctive irrigants: 1% PHMG phosphate (19 subjects), 0.2% chlorhexidine (21 subjects) and disti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrigation can easily eliminate the bacteria and its by-products from the periodontal pockets by constant water pressure on the tissue created by compressive force [10]. Several clinical studies have reported on the use of 0.6% triclosan, 1% polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate, 10% povidone-iodine, 0.25% sodium hypochlorite, 0.75% boric acid, and 20 mg/mL concentration of ozonated water as irrigations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The outcomes of the above studies were determined based on significant reduction in plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD) scores, and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain.…”
Section: Irrigation Devices/systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrigation can easily eliminate the bacteria and its by-products from the periodontal pockets by constant water pressure on the tissue created by compressive force [10]. Several clinical studies have reported on the use of 0.6% triclosan, 1% polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate, 10% povidone-iodine, 0.25% sodium hypochlorite, 0.75% boric acid, and 20 mg/mL concentration of ozonated water as irrigations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The outcomes of the above studies were determined based on significant reduction in plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD) scores, and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain.…”
Section: Irrigation Devices/systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of the above studies were determined based on significant reduction in plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), periodontal pocket depth (PPD) scores, and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain. These irrigating agents, when used as an adjunct to SRP showed comparatively better therapeutic outcomes than in the control groups [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In general, it was found that the irrigating systems significantly showed good results but in the short-term since they have had a transient action.…”
Section: Irrigation Devices/systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for excluding studies after full-text assessment were as follows: a follow-up time < 6 months (n = 7) [33][34][35][36][37][38][39], antiseptics applied to periodontal pockets prior to periodontal treatment (n = 1) [40], antiseptics applied continuously to worsening sites after an initial periodontal treatment (n = 3) [41][42][43], repeated periodontal treatment and antiseptics applied at all followup visits (n = 1) [44], and periodontal treatment established only by ultrasonic instruments (n = 3) [45][46][47].…”
Section: Study Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for excluding studies after full-text assessment were as follows: a follow-up time <6 months (n = 7) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30], antiseptics applied to periodontal pockets prior to periodontal treatment (n = 1) [31], antiseptics applied continuously to worsening sites after an initial periodontal treatment (n = 3) [32][33][34], repeated periodontal treatment and antiseptics applied at all follow-up visits (n = 1) [35], and periodontal treatment established only by ultrasonic instruments (n = 3) [36][37][38].…”
Section: Study Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%