Current scoring systems for dental caries do not consider the dynamic nature of the disease. The aims of the present study were to describe a new set of clinical caries diagnostic criteria which differentiate between active and inactive caries lesions at both the cavitated and non–cavitated levels and to evaluate the reliability of this criteria system in a population with high caries experience. Ten diagnostic codes were defined: 0 = sound; 1 = active (intact); 2 = active (surface discontinuity); 3 = active (cavity); 4 = inactive (intact); 5 = inactive (surface discontinuity); 6 = inactive (cavity); 7 = filling; 8 = filling with active caries; 9 = filling with inactive caries. Distinction between active and inactive caries lesions was made on the basis of a combination of visual and tactile criteria. The inter– and intra–examiner reliability was assessed through repeated examinations of 50 children by 2 recorders over a period of 3 years. The percentage agreement of caries diagnoses varied between 94.2 and 96.2%. The kappa values ranged between 0.74 and 0.85 for intra–examiner examinations and between 0.78 and 0.80 for inter–examiner examinations; 81.6% of all misclassifications involved non–cavitated caries lesions. Disagreement between sound surfaces and non–cavitated active or non–cavitated inactive lesions (31.3 and 31.2%, respectively) was more common than disagreement between non–cavitated active and non–cavitated inactive lesions (10.6%). The probability of reconfirming a sound, non–cavitated active or non–cavitated inactive caries lesion – given that the surface was diagnosed as either sound, non–cavitated active or non–cavitated inactive at the first examination – was 98.0, 68.7 and 72.5%, respectively. The results show that the use of a new set of clinical caries diagnostic criteria based on activity assessment can be performed with a high reliability, even when non–cavitated diagnoses are included in the criteria system.

Managing carious lesionsInnesGeneral rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain.• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Variation in the terminology used to describe clinical management of carious lesions has 57 contributed to a lack of clarity in the scientific literature and beyond. The International Caries 58 Consensus Collaboration (ICCC), present issues around terminology, a rapid review of current 59 words used in the literature for caries removal techniques and present agreed terms and 60 definitions, explaining how these were decided. 61 1 Managing carious lesions: Consensus recommendations on terminology

Tenuta LMA, van der Veen MH, Machiulskiene V. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44 (Suppl. 18): S85-S93. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12687. AbstractBackground: The non-communicable diseases dental caries and periodontal diseases pose an enormous burden on mankind. The dental biofilm is a major biological determinant common to the development of both diseases, and they share common risk factors and social determinants, important for their prevention and control. The remit of this working group was to review the current state of knowledge on epidemiology, socio-behavioural aspects as well as plaque control with regard to dental caries and periodontal diseases. Methods: Discussions were informed by three systematic reviews on (i) the global burden of dental caries and periodontitis; (ii) socio-behavioural aspects in the prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at an individual and population level; and (iii) mechanical and chemical plaque control in the simultaneous management of gingivitis and dental caries. This consensus report is based on the outcomes of these systematic reviews and on expert opinion of the participants.

Even though there is no "gold standard" for determining caries lesion activity, it is nonetheless possible to evaluate the validity of such diagnostic measures. The aim of this study was to estimate the construct and predictive validity of caries lesion activity assessments by means of their ability to reflect known effects of fluoride on caries. A three-year trial of the effect of daily supervised brushing with fluoride toothpaste was carried out among 273 12-year-old children. All children were examined clinically according to diagnostic criteria for activity assessment. The relative risk (fluoride vs. control) for caries lesion transitions among diagnostic categories was calculated. Fluoride inhibited progression of caries at all stages of lesion formation while at the same time enhancing lesion regression. The effects were most pronounced for active non-cavitated lesions. It is concluded that the clinical diagnostic criteria have construct and predictive validity for the assessment of caries lesion activity.

A 2-day workshop of ORCA and the IADR Cariology Research Group was organized to discuss and reach consensus on definitions of the most commonly used terms in cariology. The aims were to identify and to select the most commonly used terms of dental caries and dental caries management and to define them based on current concepts. Terms related to definition, diagnosis, risk assessment, and monitoring of dental caries were included. The Delphi process was used to establish terms to be considered using the nominal group method favored by consensus. Of 222 terms originally suggested by six cariologists from different countries, a total of 59 terms were reviewed after removing duplicates and unnecessary words. Sixteen experts in cariology took part in the process of reaching consensus about the definitions of the selected caries terms. Decisions were made following thorough “round table” discussions of each term and confirmed by secret electronic voting. Full agreement (100%) was reached on 17 terms, while the definitions of 6 terms were below the agreed 80% threshold of consensus. The suggested terminology is recommended for use in research, in public health, as well as in clinical practice.

The International Caries Consensus Collaboration undertook a consensus process and here presents clinical recommendations for carious tissue removal and managing cavitated carious lesions, including restoration, based on texture of demineralized dentine. Dentists should manage the disease dental caries and control activity of existing cavitated lesions to preserve hard tissues and retain teeth long-term. Entering the restorative cycle should be avoided as far as possible. Controlling the disease in cavitated carious lesions should be attempted using methods which are aimed at biofilm removal or control first. Only when cavitated carious lesions either are noncleansable or can no longer be sealed are restorative interventions indicated. When a restoration is indicated, the priorities are as follows: preserving healthy and remineralizable tissue, achieving a restorative seal, maintaining pulpal health, and maximizing restoration success. Carious tissue is removed purely to create conditions for long-lasting restorations. Bacterially contaminated or demineralized tissues close to the pulp do not need to be removed. In deeper lesions in teeth with sensible (vital) pulps, preserving pulpal health should be prioritized, while in shallow or moderately deep lesions, restoration longevity becomes more important. For teeth with shallow or moderately deep cavitated lesions, carious tissue removal is performed according toselective removal to firm dentine.In deep cavitated lesions in primary or permanent teeth,selective removal to soft dentineshould be performed, although in permanent teeth,stepwise removalis an option. The evidence and, therefore, these recommendations support less invasive carious lesion management, delaying entry to, and slowing down, the restorative cycle by preserving tooth tissue and retaining teeth long-term.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship among type 1 diabetes mellitus, dental caries, and salivary status in children. The study comprised 68, 10-15-yr-old diabetics, and 68, age- and gender-matched non-diabetic controls. Diabetics were categorized into well-to-moderately controlled (HbA1c < 9.0%) and poorly controlled (HbA1c >or= 9.0%) groups. Caries was recorded by assessing lesion activity at non-cavitated and cavity levels. Teeth were examined visually for the presence of dental plaque. Saliva was analyzed for unstimulated and stimulated flow rates, buffer effect, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, and yeasts. Diabetics had fewer caries and plaque, lower salivary flow rates and buffer effect, and more frequent growth of yeasts than their non-diabetic controls. Well-to-moderately controlled diabetics had fewer decayed surfaces and lower counts of mutans streptococci and yeasts than poorly controlled diabetics, but the level of metabolic control of diabetes had no influence on salivary flow rates and buffer effect. High caries levels in diabetics were significantly associated with age, plaque score, and decreased unstimulated salivary flow rate, but were not associated with the level of metabolic control of diabetes. High caries experience in this study population could be related to plaque accumulation and/or to changes in saliva induced by diabetes mellitus.

The results indicate that the caries preventive effect of chewing sugar-free gum is related to the chewing process itself rather than being an effect of gum sweeteners or additives, such as polyols and carbamide.