2013
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2012.755688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyaniline Nanowires-Based Electrochemical Immunosensor for Label Free Detection of Japanese Encephalitis Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (2), the detection sensitivity was 0.024 ngmL −1 . This detection limit is substantially lower than the previously reported detection limit of 10 ngmL −1 for an interdigitated sensor [1] and a polyaniline nanowires based electrochemical immunosensor at below 10 ngmL −1 [5]. The CNPs modified SPCE biosensor reported in this work exhibited more than an order of magnitude higher in sensitivity as compared to the unmodified SPCE biosensor for JEV detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From (2), the detection sensitivity was 0.024 ngmL −1 . This detection limit is substantially lower than the previously reported detection limit of 10 ngmL −1 for an interdigitated sensor [1] and a polyaniline nanowires based electrochemical immunosensor at below 10 ngmL −1 [5]. The CNPs modified SPCE biosensor reported in this work exhibited more than an order of magnitude higher in sensitivity as compared to the unmodified SPCE biosensor for JEV detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Early diagnosis is therefore critical in controlling JE outbreak and preventing the development of long-term serious symptoms in patients [3,4]. The conventional diagnostic methods for JEV include Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA), Plaque Reduction Neutralisation Test, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), and virus isolation [1,2,5]. However, these methods require costly and bulky laboratory facilities, tedious diagnostic procedures, specially trained personnel, and long assay time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent times, biosensor-based methods have been envisaged as a promising tool for rapid detection of JEV antigens in outbreaks as well as for preliminary screenings and to recompense the conventional diagnostic methods (Tuan et al, 2013). In addition to that, they necessitate no costly chemicals and provide an outcome in few minutes.…”
Section: Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to that, they necessitate no costly chemicals and provide an outcome in few minutes. Serum antibody-based biosensors can detect up to the 1-10 g JEV antigens /ml with a detection limit of 0.75 g/ml (Huy et al, 2011) whereas electrochemical immunosensor developed using the APTES-GA-PrA-serum method (Tran et al, 2012) and Polyaniline nanowires (Tuan et al, 2013) detects the range between 25 ng ml−1 and 1µg ml−1 of JEV antigens, and normal detection limit was about 10 ng ml−1.…”
Section: Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%