“…[ 33 ] As shown in the Figure a, the original N/HCSs show the worst ORR activity with the half‐wave potential ( E 1/2 = 0.740 V), and limited current density ( J L = 4.50 mA cm −2 ). After the introduction of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, the ORR activity of these Fe x @N/HCSs increased significantly, and Fe 20 @N/HCSs material exhibit the best performance ( E 1/2 = 0.850 V and J L = 5.750 mA cm −2 ), which is comparable to that of the commercial 20 wt% Pt/C ( E 1/2 = 0.859 V and J L = 5.361 mA cm −2 ), and also is outperforms these of many previously reported yolk‐shell structure ORR electrocatalysts (Table S1, Supporting Information), such as Co NP/NC‐700 ( E 1/2 = 0.80 V and J L = 5.10 mA cm −2 ), [ 44 ] Co‐C@Co 9 S 8 DSNCs ( E 1/2 = 0.83 V and J L = 5.25 mA cm −2 ), [ 45 ] Co/HNCP ( E 1/2 = 0.845 V, Tafel plots = 64 mV dec −1 , and J L = 5.401 mA cm −2 ), [ 46 ] Fe@FeN x /N‐C ( E 1/2 = 0.82 V, Tafel plots = 94.5 mV dec −1 , and J L = 5.25 mA cm −2 ), [ 47 ] Fe 3 C@N/C‐1 ( E 1/2 = 0.815 V, Tafel plots = 68.62 mV dec −1 , and J L = 5.78 mA cm −2 ), [ 48 ] etc. Compared with the Fe 20 @N/HCSs, the limited current density of Fe 30 @N/HCSs become lower obviously, which attributed to the introduction of excess Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles reduce the electrical conductivity of electrocatalyst (Figure 3e), and the increased ratio of two electron transfer for excess Fe 3 O 4 in the ORR.…”