2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollution source identification using a coupled diffusion model with a genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate estimates can be achieved with only three receptors, provided that these are placed down-wind the source. The error in the predictions the source flow rate are higher and much more sensitive to the number of receptor and on their location within the district (Akçelik et al , 2003;Rudd et al , 2012;Khlaifi et al, 2009). Future work will concern the extension of this analysis to different wind direction and obstacles layout, and to time-dependent pollutant emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate estimates can be achieved with only three receptors, provided that these are placed down-wind the source. The error in the predictions the source flow rate are higher and much more sensitive to the number of receptor and on their location within the district (Akçelik et al , 2003;Rudd et al , 2012;Khlaifi et al, 2009). Future work will concern the extension of this analysis to different wind direction and obstacles layout, and to time-dependent pollutant emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…it admits a unique solution which depends continuously on the data. Otherwise, we need specific optimization and resolution algorithms (Giacobbo et al, 2002;Menut et al, 2006;Rudd et al, 2012;Delle Monache et al, 2008;Khlaifi et al, 2009) such as the Gauss-Newton method, the genetic algorithm, the Bayesian method, the MCMC. In our inverse code, the inversion of (1) varies depending on the number of pollutant sources and on the availability of receptor concentrations.…”
Section: Inverse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N, Global Allen et al (2007aAllen et al ( , 2007b, Haupt (2005), Haupt et al (2006Haupt et al ( , 2009Khlaifi, Ionescu, and Candau (2009);Yang, Yang, Yin, and Li (2008) For the continuous release, the Gaussian plume model (Daniel & Joseph, 2002) was employed. The relevant formulation is…”
Section: Y Localmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these uncertain factors should be considered for optimal sensor placement. The simulation-optimization method based on uncertain scenarios can be adopted [14][15][16][17][18]. These uncertain scenarios are usually generated through coarse enumeration [19][20][21] or sampling of a relatively small subset of the time and location of the injection with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, assuming a uniform probability distribution [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%