2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse calculation approaches for source determination in hazardous chemical releases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, this function must be a norm function F : ℝ m → ℝ describing the degree of similarity between estimated measurements given by the model at each potential source location, that is, the components of the vector μ est ( q , x ) = q a ( x ), and observed values measured at the monitoring locations, that is, the components of the vector μ obs . In order to minimize such a cost function, a variety of methods has been proposed (see Hutchinson et al, ; Zheng & Chen, ). The next section focuses, and generalizes, the one used by Issartel et al (), Sharan et al (, ), or Singh and Rani ().…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basically, this function must be a norm function F : ℝ m → ℝ describing the degree of similarity between estimated measurements given by the model at each potential source location, that is, the components of the vector μ est ( q , x ) = q a ( x ), and observed values measured at the monitoring locations, that is, the components of the vector μ obs . In order to minimize such a cost function, a variety of methods has been proposed (see Hutchinson et al, ; Zheng & Chen, ). The next section focuses, and generalizes, the one used by Issartel et al (), Sharan et al (, ), or Singh and Rani ().…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of atmospheric releases, numerous techniques have been proposed to produce solutions to STE problems. They can be broadly classified as either Bayesian‐based or optimization‐based methods (Hutchinson et al, ; Zheng & Chen, ). Bayesian‐based approaches (Winiarek et al, ; Xue et al, ; Yee et al, , among others) provide posterior probability density functions of the source parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chai et al (2015) developed the emission inversion method based on a Lagrangian model and a cost function using the transfer coefficient matrix, and conducted sensitivity analysis for the inverse estimation by using the original concentration c and ln(c) differences between model and observations in the cost function. By comparison, Zheng and Chen (2011) suggest that optimization modeling methods has advantages over probability modeling methods on source inversion. However, many estimates have been shown to be quite sensitive to the prior information on the source term used in the inversion.…”
Section: Identification Of Radioactive Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emissions and winds are constrained in an inverse method by minimizing differences between dispersion model predictions and observations of materials transported and deposited downwind from the source location (e.g., Davoine and Bocquet, 2007;Zheng and Chen, 2011). Building upon our previous work using Bayesian inverse modeling to estimate regionalscale greenhouse gas emissions and meteorological uncertainty in an urban-scale dispersion experiment , we developed an ensemble-based inverse modeling system for analyzing nuclear power plant dispersion events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%