2014
DOI: 10.29092/uacm.v11i25.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Políticas sociales focalizadas y el dilema de la justicia

Abstract: El artículo analiza el impacto de las políticas sociales focalizadas en la distribución de los bienes primarios materiales (ingreso y riqueza) y simbólicos (bases sociales de respeto a sí mismo). Recupera los aportes de Esping-Andersen, así como los estudios realizados en Estados Unidos sobre el apoyo a programas focalizados. La tesis es que las políticas focalizadas, aunque impactan positivamente en la distribución justa de bienes materiales, minan las bases sociales de respeto a sí mismo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Feather (2003) defines deservingness as “judgments that are related to outcomes that are earned or achieved as products of a person’s actions, where these actions are either directly observed or indirectly inferred from information about a person’s qualities” (p. 368). Deservingness is a socially judged and constructed concept due to its cognitive and axiological components (Ochman, 2014); it is expressed in a moral register, and inevitably reckoned in relational terms, so stakeholders’ presumptions, which are personal and professionally influenced, can play a powerful role as empirical data (Willen and Cook, 2016). Several criteria to assess a person’s need for institutional aid have been depicted (Cook, 1979; De Swaan, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feather (2003) defines deservingness as “judgments that are related to outcomes that are earned or achieved as products of a person’s actions, where these actions are either directly observed or indirectly inferred from information about a person’s qualities” (p. 368). Deservingness is a socially judged and constructed concept due to its cognitive and axiological components (Ochman, 2014); it is expressed in a moral register, and inevitably reckoned in relational terms, so stakeholders’ presumptions, which are personal and professionally influenced, can play a powerful role as empirical data (Willen and Cook, 2016). Several criteria to assess a person’s need for institutional aid have been depicted (Cook, 1979; De Swaan, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several criteria to assess a person’s need for institutional aid have been depicted (Cook, 1979; De Swaan, 1988). Van Oorschot (2000: 36), for example, identifies five principal criteria of deservingness (control, need, identity, attitude, and reciprocity); other scholars admit the influence of mass media and political discourse in the perception of deservingness (Ochman, 2014); health related-deservingness has been less studied (Willen and Cook, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acuerdo con De Sena (2014), las políticas sociales impactan directamente en las condiciones de producción y reproducción de vida de las personas, en ellas subyacen modelos de sociedad deseables, de allí su dificultad para conceptualizarlas. No obstante, existe cierto consenso sobre tres criterios a partir de los cuales se determinan los sujetos de derecho de tales políticas: necesidad (herramientas focalizadas o focalización, Filgueira, 2014; modelo de focalización o políticas asistencialistas, Home Arias, 2012; y políticas sociales focalizadas, Ochman, 2014), contribución (modelos contributivos, Filgueira, 2014) y ciudadanía (universalismo o políticas universales, Danani, 2017;modelos universales no-contributivos, Filgueira, 2014; y universalización o políticas universalistas, Home Arias, 2012).…”
unclassified
“…Los defensores de la focalización sostienen que este tipo de políticas son costoefectivas, ya que permiten racionalizar el gasto público (Filgueira, 2014;Home Arias, 2012;Ochman, 2014). Por otra parte, quienes están en contra, argumentan que los altos costos administrativos que genera determinar quién es el grupo merecedor de la política social neutralizan tal eficiencia fiscal y, a su vez, dicha determinación suele ser inexacta, derivando en errores de inclusión/exclusión (Garriga & Rosales, 2013;Home Arias, 2012;Ochman, 2014).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation