Political Education in Croatian Secondary Schools: An Emergency Reaction to a Chaotic Context

Abstract

The article draws on an analysis exploring how the content and aims of secondary school political education have been framed in official Croatian policy documents following the country's war for independence, with particular focus on the underlying conception of citizenship promoted in such a post-conflict setting. The article also addresses how official textbooks for the secondary school subject of 'politics and economics' shape this conception of citizenship through their choice of topics. It is argued in the article that the case of Croatian political education illustrates how a social and historical tipping point can influence what counts as official political knowledge to be transmitted in schools, and thus exemplifies the transitional nature of such knowledge in emergency settings. This locates the issue of knowledge transmitted in Croatian secondary school political education in a broader theoretical discussion on how knowledge can be radically affected by 'paradigm shifts' in social and political circumstances, and raises the question of ways in which its arbitrariness can be minimised. To this end, special attention is given to the role of skills and values in political education.

Reformulating Civic Education as Political Education in Indonesia in the Convergence Era

“…Political education in various countries has its own guideline and urgency. Croatia started with outlining objectives, then outlining tasks and finally providing a table of contents for the subject [91]. Furthermore, Canada suggested that for the Civic tests, all the questions should be about: rights and obligations as Canadian, Canadian democratic history, Canadian social and cultural symbols, and Canadian physical and political geography [92].…”

Conflict, transition and education for ‘political generosity’: learning from the experience of ex-combatants in Northern Ireland

“…This is not to say that 'thin' and patriotic models of citizenship education are no longer part of educational responses in transitional societies. For example, Doolan and Domazet (2007) contend that while subjects explicitly transferring Marxist ideology in Croatia were replaced with subjects promoting democratic ideals, the concept of citizenship underpinning the curriculum remained passive and nationalistic. Further, research suggests that the threat of international terrorism or involvement in international conflict tends to result in teachers constraining critical debate (Porath 2006) Such passive approaches to citizenship education cannot provide young people with the range of skills required to examine critically the complex nature of citizenship in contested societies nor to engage with or understand the dynamics of transitional justice.…”