2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07628-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PO-1177 A heart valves contouring atlas on average intensity projection 4D-CT for lung cancer radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would not be possible to encompass all of these factors in a user-friendly atlas, but the guidance presented provides basic principles. Observer accuracy metrics compared favourably to the other atlases in the cardiac substructure field (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For example, the mean DSCs reported by Socha et al for a cardiac valve atlas ranged between 0.45 and 0.69, and HDMs were > 2 mm (20), whereas in this study, mean DSCs ranged between 0.78 and 0.83, and HDMs 1.1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It would not be possible to encompass all of these factors in a user-friendly atlas, but the guidance presented provides basic principles. Observer accuracy metrics compared favourably to the other atlases in the cardiac substructure field (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For example, the mean DSCs reported by Socha et al for a cardiac valve atlas ranged between 0.45 and 0.69, and HDMs were > 2 mm (20), whereas in this study, mean DSCs ranged between 0.78 and 0.83, and HDMs 1.1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…Observer accuracy metrics compared favourably to the other atlases in the cardiac substructure field (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). For example, the mean DSCs reported by Socha et al for a cardiac valve atlas ranged between 0.45 and 0.69, and HDMs were > 2 mm (20), whereas in this study, mean DSCs ranged between 0.78 and 0.83, and HDMs 1.1 mm. As such atlas validation studies typically demonstrate lower concordance for small structures (16,17), the results presented are better than anticipated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond cardiac motion, other unresolved issues in cardiac substructure segmentation include the lack of standardised great vessel definitions, as these are not defined in the published cardiac atlases [23] , [42] , [49] , [50] , [51] . Current atlases also do not recommend subtraction of the cardiac chamber blood pool, which is likely to be confounding how the dose metrics of the cardiac chamber muscles are interpreted [37] , [46] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%