2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an established deep learning auto-segmentation tool for cardiac substructures in 4D radiotherapy planning scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to many other studies presenting models for automatic segmentation of cardiac substructures, this work uses far less training data to achieve similar results, requiring only 10 images with manually contoured cardiac substructures compared to other approaches which used 41 [ 19 ], 127 [ 50 ], and 217 [ 14 ] cases for training. An overview of published tools for cardiac substructure segmentation can be found in a recent publication by Walls et al (Supplementary Table 11) [ 18 ]. The model proposed in this work provides automatic definitions of 18 independent structures, more than any other method currently available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to many other studies presenting models for automatic segmentation of cardiac substructures, this work uses far less training data to achieve similar results, requiring only 10 images with manually contoured cardiac substructures compared to other approaches which used 41 [ 19 ], 127 [ 50 ], and 217 [ 14 ] cases for training. An overview of published tools for cardiac substructure segmentation can be found in a recent publication by Walls et al (Supplementary Table 11) [ 18 ]. The model proposed in this work provides automatic definitions of 18 independent structures, more than any other method currently available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haq et al [ 14 ] used a training set of 217 thoracic CT scans to develop a model for the heart, cardiac chambers, and great vessels (including the inferior vena cava and complete aorta extending down to the most inferior slice of the heart), and achieved better accuracy when measured with the DSC and 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance. This method has also been validated on an independent dataset [ 18 ], with results suggesting reduced accuracy when applied to new data as well as systematic variations. A DL model developed by Garrett Fernandes et al [ 50 ] to delineate these same cardiac substructures from a training dataset 127 CT scans was validated on an independent dataset and also achieved higher DSC values, however a substantial reduction in performance was observed on CT imaging acquired without contrast enhancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 4D-AVE was used for all segmentations, and an auto-segmented LA contour based was provided for the observers, which they were permitted to modify. The LA structure was an autosegmentation using the Haq tool (21), which is based on the Feng definitions ( 16), aligning with how contemporary treatment planning workflows are commonly furnished with automated tools for organs at risk including the cardiac substructures (22). Geometric and dosimetric comparisons of the observer structures were then made with reference structures previously jointly created by GW, CM and PB, using a range of metrics as per recommendations for inter-observer variation studies (23,24).…”
Section: Atlas Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models have also been validated on datasets from other institutions 23 demonstrating their robustness and reproducibility. NTCP and TCP models are based on radiotherapy dose and radiomics features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%