2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pluralist perspectives and diverse responses: Exploring multiplexed framing in incumbent responses to digital disruption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, digital transformation has the potential to impact different stages of the innovation process in ways that are complex and causally ambiguous, due to the vast array of enabling technologies and the multiple ways in which they can “augment” product and service performance (e.g., Barrett et al, 2015; Hui, 2014; Iansiti & Lakhani, 2014). The boundaries between industries and product categories become blurred and competition is increasingly shaped by multisided platforms and ecosystems (Cennamo et al, 2020; Cozzolino et al, 2018; Fraser & Ansari, 2020; Nambisan & Baron, 2019; Parker et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, digital transformation has the potential to impact different stages of the innovation process in ways that are complex and causally ambiguous, due to the vast array of enabling technologies and the multiple ways in which they can “augment” product and service performance (e.g., Barrett et al, 2015; Hui, 2014; Iansiti & Lakhani, 2014). The boundaries between industries and product categories become blurred and competition is increasingly shaped by multisided platforms and ecosystems (Cennamo et al, 2020; Cozzolino et al, 2018; Fraser & Ansari, 2020; Nambisan & Baron, 2019; Parker et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, different studies have tried to decline such reflections in more operative terms, focussing on the links between DT and traditional industries (Iansiti and Lakhani, 2019; Venkatraman, 2017), on the role of the DT for the creation of new multisided platforms and knowledge ecosystems (Cozzolino et al , 2018; Elia et al , 2021; Fraser and Ansari, 2020; Nambisan and Baron, 2019; Parker et al , 2017), on the integration of digital and non-digital assets for augmenting product and service performance (Barrett et al , 2015; Hui, 2014), on the change that DT brings to the innovation processes (Lu and Ramamurthy, 2011; Ransbotham et al , 2016; Reibenspiess et al , 2020; Sedera et al , 2016), on the corporate innovation strategies and actions answering digitalisation (Fitzgerald et al , 2014; Svahn et al , 2017) and on many other themes, as summarised in their effective review by Appio et al (2021).…”
Section: Background: State-of-the-arts and Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the disruptive implications of digital technologies for businesses have been greatly highlighted ( Nambisan et al, 2019 ). Then, several studies have noticed the linkages between digital transformation and disruptive innovation ( Fraser and Ansari, 2021 ; Zhang and Zhu, 2021 ). However, scant attention has paid to disruptive innovation’s evolution mechanism and fulfillment path in the emerging digital economy context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, few studies have focused on the established large enterprises ( Fraser and Ansari, 2021 ), while considered less on start-ups. Despite the existed business practices, academic attentions have fallen behind to pay enough attentions to related theoretical development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%