2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41284-017-0110-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plural policing and public opinion in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This blurring was in large part due to issues of poor regulation. Consequently, much of the existing literature on Brazilian private security is focused on demarcation—attempting to define what is public and what is private (Abrahamsen and Leander, 2016; Da Silva, 2014, 2015, 2017; Zanetic, 2009, 2013).…”
Section: Private Security and The Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This blurring was in large part due to issues of poor regulation. Consequently, much of the existing literature on Brazilian private security is focused on demarcation—attempting to define what is public and what is private (Abrahamsen and Leander, 2016; Da Silva, 2014, 2015, 2017; Zanetic, 2009, 2013).…”
Section: Private Security and The Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before going any further, it is worth emphasising just how significant this survey is. In terms of respondent numbers, it is quadruple the size of the next largest equivalent study in the UK (Rowland and Coupe 2014 ) and more than double the size of the next largest equivalent study globally (de Silva Lopes 2018 ). 15 In other words, it stands as the largest and most representative study of its kind ever produced and, moreover, the only one which takes account of the Covid-19 pandemic—and until now it has received no attention within the academic community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 Rowland and Coupe’s ( 2014 ) UK study numbered 517 respondents. Da Silva Lopes’s ( 2018 ) Brazilian study had 840 respondents. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%