1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64891-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleural Flap Closure of Pericardial Defects Following Intrapericardial Pneumonectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Esses são os motivos pelos quais tem-se buscado maneiras de se fechar a cavidade pericárdica com técnicas diversas de pericardioplastia (10)(11)(12) e com substitutos do pericárdio, biológicos e sintéticos. Os primeiros podem ser autólogos (7,13,14) ou heterólogos (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) , os últimos, inabsorvíveis (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) e absorvíveis (27)(28)(29)(30) .…”
unclassified
“…Esses são os motivos pelos quais tem-se buscado maneiras de se fechar a cavidade pericárdica com técnicas diversas de pericardioplastia (10)(11)(12) e com substitutos do pericárdio, biológicos e sintéticos. Os primeiros podem ser autólogos (7,13,14) ou heterólogos (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) , os últimos, inabsorvíveis (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) e absorvíveis (27)(28)(29)(30) .…”
unclassified
“…Increasingly, some authors have recommended routine closure of all pericardial defects by a variety of means. This can be by primary closure 5 , patch closure with artificial materials 7 , patch closure using pleural flap 7,22,23 or patch closure using fascia lata from the lateral thigh 21 . Closure of the pericardium increases the risk of tamponade and artificial materials provide a risk of infection 7,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are advantages and disadvantages to the several kinds of pericardial substitute that have been used clinically. Autologous material such as pleura (3) or fascia lata (4,5) make good choices, but, even if it is used as a pericardial substitute, finding a source is difficult and adhesion with the heart and grafts is severe; autologous material is very disadvantageous during re‐operation. Heterologous materials such as a glutaraldehyde cross‐linked porcine, bovine, and equine pericardium (6–8) show excellent handling properties and minimal epicardial reaction, but they show degenerative changes such as calcification (8,9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%