Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has been suggested to contribute to the increasing trends of external genital malformation in male newborns. In Northeastern Brazil, the poor sanitary conditions found in the favelas encourage the widespread use of pesticides. This 2-year study of a total birth cohort of full-term male newborns in the regional hospitals of Campina Grande (Paraíba, Brazil) sought to (1) accurately establish for the first time the incidences of neonatal male genital malformations, (2) investigate the endocrine and genetic aetiologies of these malformations, and (3) evaluate their associations with possible prenatal exposure to EDCs. A total of 2710 male newborns were explored for cryptorchidism, hypospadias and micropenis. Cases were referred to the Pediatric Endocrine Clinic for endocrine and genetic investigations, and all parents were interviewed about their environmental/occupational exposure to EDCs before/during pregnancy by paediatric endocrinologists using a detailed questionnaire. We observed 56 cases of genital malformation (2.07%), including 23 cryptorchidism (0.85%), 15 hypospadias (0.55%), and 18 micropenis (0.66%). All cases exhibited normal/subnormal testosterone production and none presented androgen receptor or 5α-reductase gene mutation. More than 92% of these newborns presented foetal contamination by EDCs, as their mothers reported daily domestic use of pesticides (i.e., DDT) and other EDCs. Most of these undervirilized male newborns presented additional EDC contamination, as 80.36% of the mothers and 58.63% of the fathers reported paid or unpaid work that entailed the use of pesticides and other EDCs before/during pregnancy for the mothers and around the time of fertilization for the fathers. The high rate of micropenis in our population associated with an elevated percentage of parental environmental/occupational exposure to EDCs before/during pregnancy indicates that foetal contamination may be a risk factor for the development of male external genital malformation.
Ten minutes were sufficient to provoke necrosis, and longer contact increased the area of necrosis. Solution concentration levels were more important in damage production: 1.83% was sufficient for epithelial necrosis, 7.33% caused submucosal necrosis, and 14.66% muscle and adventitia necrosis; 33.66% solutions caused lung and trachea damage after 10 minutes and esophageal perforation after 120 minutes.
Two patients suffering with severe pain due to metastatic abdominal neoplasm were selected to examine whether subarachnoid neostigmine provided effective pain relief. Neostigmine was injected through a catheter introduced into the subarachnoid space at L4-L5. Patients were monitored for changes in arterial blood pressure, cardiac and respiratory rates, body temperature, level of consciousness and neurologic change. Pain was classified by the patients on a verbal four-grade scale, and analgesia was classified on a verbal three-grade scale. Complete pain relief was obtained 2 h after neostigmine (0.2 mg) in one patient and 4 h after neostigmine (0.1 mg) in the second patient. Pain of mild intensity returned 20 and 22 h after drug administration, respectively. Gastrointestinal discomfort was observed in both cases, but nausea and vomiting occurred only in the patient treated with the highest dose of neostigmine. No significant change in the monitored parameters was observed, except for a 6-h period of decreased blood pressure in the patient treated with the lower dose of neostigmine which required no specific treatment. The results obtained in these anecdotal cases indicate that subarachnoid neostigmine may provide analgesia in patients with pain arising from neoplasia, but further studies using controlled trials are needed before the drug is brought into clinical use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.