2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic-zone advanced analysis – Formulation including semi-rigid connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is revealed here, through SO, that the ceiling beams are also important for increasing the lateral stiffness of unbraced modular buildings. At this junction, it should be pointed out that although the MRF benchmark structure requires less structural steel in meeting a particular frequency, the achievement of rigid connection for MRF structures in practice requires an extensive amount of fabrication onsite and, consequently, can be relatively expensive [62]. Furthermore, it should be reemphasised that the rotational stiffness of the so-called semi-rigid connection here corresponds to the classification boundary between the "rigid" and "semi-rigid" connections for unbraced MRFs in Eurocode 3.…”
Section: Self-weight Comparison With Optimally Designed Mrfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is revealed here, through SO, that the ceiling beams are also important for increasing the lateral stiffness of unbraced modular buildings. At this junction, it should be pointed out that although the MRF benchmark structure requires less structural steel in meeting a particular frequency, the achievement of rigid connection for MRF structures in practice requires an extensive amount of fabrication onsite and, consequently, can be relatively expensive [62]. Furthermore, it should be reemphasised that the rotational stiffness of the so-called semi-rigid connection here corresponds to the classification boundary between the "rigid" and "semi-rigid" connections for unbraced MRFs in Eurocode 3.…”
Section: Self-weight Comparison With Optimally Designed Mrfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, many studies [6][7][8] pointed out the economic benefits that can result from a design considering the real behaviour of beam-to-column joints. De Alvarenga (2020) [9] suggested new numerical formulation that integrates the behaviour of the plastic zone finite element model for semi-rigid steel frames. However, Astaneh and Nader (1992) and Mazzolani and Piluso (2012) [10,11] have provided some attempts to codify the semi rigidity for seismic steel structures, and the evidence of the positive effect of semi-rigid joints in such structures is continuously increasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e performance of base-isolated steel structures having special moment frames was assessed by Rezaei Rad and Banazadeh [16]. Alvarenga [17] proposed a new numerical formulation that includes the behavior of the semirigid connection into plastic-zone finite element model for steel plane frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%