2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02556-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma, urine and tissue concentrations of Flunixin and Meloxicam in Pigs

Abstract: Background The objective of this study was to determine the renal clearance of flunixin and meloxicam in pigs and compare plasma and urine concentrations and tissue residues. Urine clearance is important for livestock show animals where urine is routinely tested for these drugs. Fourteen Yorkshire/Landrace cross pigs were housed in individual metabolism cages to facilitate urine collection. This is a unique feature of this study compared to other reports. Animals received either 2.2 mg/kg fluni… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rapid initial distribution phase was followed by a plasma clearance phase whose t1/2 depended on the physical chemistry characteristics of drugs [37]. Lipid-soluble agents had lower plasma concentrations [38][39][40], perhaps because a more lipid soluble drug might result in more-extensive tissue uptake, a larger volume of distribution, lower plasma clearance values and a longer terminal half-life [41]. This then could lead to a relatively less significant interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid initial distribution phase was followed by a plasma clearance phase whose t1/2 depended on the physical chemistry characteristics of drugs [37]. Lipid-soluble agents had lower plasma concentrations [38][39][40], perhaps because a more lipid soluble drug might result in more-extensive tissue uptake, a larger volume of distribution, lower plasma clearance values and a longer terminal half-life [41]. This then could lead to a relatively less significant interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%